Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Utah Girl
My mom also said that the reporter said that Ricci would never answer who picked him up that day from the auto repair shop...

If Ricci was not involved, he probably wouldn't identify the person because he knew that person would also be harrassed and maybe even jailed on circumstantial charges.

41 posted on 08/30/2002 10:11:36 PM PDT by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: varina davis
If Ricci was not involved, he probably wouldn't identify the person because he knew that person would also be harrassed and maybe even jailed on circumstantial charges.

Richard was jailed because of parole violations. I know that is a technicality that they used to hold him but even without the abduction, there were the theft, burglary, and bank robbery charges that were pending. It is possible that his friend had some kind of unrelated charges that he could have been exposed to but we will probably never know now. It is a mistake though to believe that Ricci was being held because of some circumstantial evidence. That is still illegal in this country.

44 posted on 08/30/2002 10:19:07 PM PDT by sandude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: varina davis
If Ricci was not involved, he probably wouldn't identify the person because he knew that person would also be harrassed and maybe even jailed on circumstantial charges.

Brilliant, Varina, Ricci wouldn't give up his partner because of his high ethics. Aren't you a judge of character.

53 posted on 08/30/2002 10:27:52 PM PDT by Sherlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson