Mary Katherine,....It has been said by Lois, Ed, and other's in the press, that MK recognised the voice of the abductor..right?
Question:..How many convicts or known criminals does Mary Katherine know? I would safely say none.
One slilmey character we know she probably knew is Ricci..right?
If MK recognised his voice, I assume she told the police, and her parents..after all, a 9 yr. old is not going to hold that back...right?
If in fact, it WAS RICCI..don't you think that is all they would need to arrest him? Couple that with Jeanne Boylan's interview with her, where we do not know if she did a sketch or not.
If MK never gave out that she recognised it as Ricci..then she had to give a DIFFERENT NAME she was familiar with. We are to believe that she did in fact recogise THE VOICE...quoting her mother, Lois Smart. right?
If it was someone else..then why wasn't Ricci elilminated? Could this mean he had an accomplis, and that person was the one who abducted Elizabeth?? Well, if that be the case...Did MK know that voice so well, that she in fact put a name to it?
SHE DID PUT A NAME TO IT OR THE MOTHER IS LYING...I don't believe lovely Lois Smart lied!! So we have a NAME....
If the name is not Ricci, (or he would not be a potential suspect..but a suspect)..and the girl NAMED the person she recognised as the ONE WHO TOOK ELIZABETH..A PERSON SHE KNEW....and it was not a deralect...then it HAD TO BE SOMEONE MK WAS FAMILIAR WITH....!! Who does that leave?
IF SOMEONE FINGER'S RICCI NOW....it is his word against nothing...and it needs forecsic evidence...did they find fingerprints? Did they find evidence in the car?..if they found Elizabeth's DNA in the Jeep, an arrest would be made...(I am talking here of DNA that could be dated, or blood) If they found fingerprints in the house..an arrest would be made..
There was no arrest..there was no suspect..there is one witness..a little 9 yr. old girl who saw the person and recognised the voice and could describe what that person was wearing...and I will say again...if she said it was Ricci's voice..he would have been arrested, and that little star witness would be on the witness stand in a trial.
Just thinking.
You're right. Also, I do not believe for a New York minute that MK wouldn't have recognized Ricci, having seen the supposed kidnapper twice within about an hour. He had a very distinctive appearance and she was very familiar with him from his lengthy work in her home.
Some people are likely very relieved that Ricci is no longer a threat to tell what he knew and/or observed.
They didn't need to arrest him because he was already incarcerated. They didn't need to charge him because they were still building their case.
Neenah....blood and fingerprints can not be dated...fingerprints are known to stay put for several years evidentally...
the only thing that I can think of that would put Lizzie in that jeep would be LARGER Fingerprints and red fibers from her jammies...
I am not saying she is dead....but we have to face the reality..
so if this is purely a burglary gone bad...why kill the child???.....why not just take your chances or run for the hills instead of killing the girl....how could anyone...how could anyone do that >>>