Skip to comments.
I Am Reinstating My Previously Witheld Monthly Payment To FR
vanity
| 08-26-02
| mercy
Posted on 08/26/2002 9:57:23 AM PDT by mercy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 961-980, 981-1,000, 1,001-1,020 ... 1,201-1,215 next last
To: Son of Rooster
Oh gawl you're sweet!
To: Cultural Jihad
*chuckle* yeah... I know. It's odd.
To: Roscoe
He'll run back to DU claiming victory. Probably. Ah the bliss of such delusion... wish I knew what that was, then maybe life wouldn't hurt so much.
To: Jolly Rodgers
Wine, wine, lie, ands whinge ! You called me names, and started this whole juvenile form of posting; which I doi NOT engage in. It is patently obvious, that you can't comprehend written English , refute any reply, and can only type a programed , nonsensical response. If you ever manage to master logic, debate, and writing, do try to reply to me then ; until such a time, your boring, repedative , irrelevant mewlings don't warrant a reply.
To: nopardons
wine = whine ; but, in your case, it really might be " wine ". LOL
To: Terriergal
Democratic Underground...a left leaning, opposite, the dark side of the web, not like the bright shining light here on FR. Don't go there, it's full of abortionists, animal rights pukes, and liberals. Not a good place for a lady like you to go to unescorted. Take Cyrano if ya get brave and go.
SOR
To: Jolly Rodgers
The problem is not the party -- the problem is the electorate and the solution lies with the indiviudal to change the R party and the electorate using the powers of the already entrenched Freedom thinking people in the R party. Bush made it clear during the election that he didn't need, nor want, the support or advice of conservatives. He's got his own agenda and it is in direct contradiction to the the values I hold dear. That is why I will not support him.
The problem is not Bush -- the problem is the electorate.
The solution is not to dilute the current concentration of freedom lovers in the R party -- the solution is to keep it concentrated.
The solution is not to move away from the non-freedom lovers in the R party -- the solution is to interact and change these non-freedom lovers in the R party and then to change the general electorate with the powers and organization of the R party.
The politicians will follow...
To: Son of Rooster; Terriergal
disregard previous...I didn't read it clearly enough, now I get what you meant!!!
Bliss....
SOR
To: nopardons
Wine, wine, lie, ands whinge ! You called me names, and started this whole juvenile form of posting; which I doi NOT engage in. It is patently obvious, that you can't comprehend written English , refute any reply, and can only type a programed , nonsensical response. If you ever manage to master logic, debate, and writing, do try to reply to me then ; until such a time, your boring, repedative , irrelevant mewlings don't warrant a reply. Heh-heh-heh. There you go again. Doing the very thing you are accusing. What a classic. So, tell me about how GW Bush eliminated the Department of Education. Or, perhaps you could explain how the Republican controlled congress banned abortion. Wait, tell me about how the Bush administration is shrinking the federal government and returning power to the states. There's just so many wonderful acheivements you could tell me about -- if only your boys had actually achieved them rather than running at light speed in the other direction.
To: FreeReign
The problem is not Bush -- the problem is the electorate. The solution is not to dilute the current concentration of freedom lovers in the R party -- the solution is to keep it concentrated. The solution is not to move away from the non-freedom lovers in the R party -- the solution is to interact and change these non-freedom lovers in the R party and then to change the general electorate with the powers and organization of the R party. The politicians will follow... You already said that and I explained why I disagree. To be honest, there was a time when I was politically immature and believed exactly as you are advocating. Eventually I realized that it was not realistic. The party drives the boat and for the last few years it has demonstrated total disregard for the sentiment of the electorate. They look us in the eye and stab us in the heart -- knowing full well that they can still count on our support come election day.
To: nopardons
wine = whine ; but, in your case, it really might be " wine ". LOL Thanks for continuing to demonstrate your intellectual bankruptcy. :-) You never fail to provide.
To: Jolly Rodgers
We conservatives have to wonder why you nay-sayers are even here. The owner has a plan in place, and since you don't want to participate it only makes you look like a DU type. Capisca?
To: Jolly Rodgers
Your abject lack of knowledge ... historical, political, and goevernmental, is shocking !
You do seem quite obsessed with what to write next, to me, whilst utterly ignoring whatever I post. Ergo, post away, kiddo ; everyone will just sit back and laygh at your banal, inane, unclever, dumbed down posts.
Why not attempt to explain, here, in cogent English , how Congress , alone, can overturn something such as legal abortion, how long that would take ( considering the makeup of both Houses ), and the fact that ( hint, hint ) the previous president was sent a Bill, that outlawed partial birth abortion and vetoed it. Thatnks for trying to participate; to bad you are incapable of doing so with any worth whatsoever. :-)
To: Terriergal
Naaaaaaaaaaaaaw ... they hurt far worse than we, who have open eyes , do. They tell each other lies, hoping that that'll make them " feel " good. Then, the spew the same lies out , at others, whether they agree or not. That's much worse pain ... thinking " your " side can walk on water , but , deep in the guts, knowing it's not true .
To: Jolly Rodgers
To be honest, there was a time when I was politically immature and believed exactly as you are advocating. Eventually I realized that it was not realistic. The party drives the boat and for the last few years it has demonstrated total disregard for the sentiment of the electorate.You believe the R party disregards the sentiment of the electorate -- I beleive it gives the electorate what it wants minus a sliiigth nod to it's base.
If I may be quite frank -- and frankly speaking I am -- I was a third party advocate when I was a kid -- you are a third party advocate now.
To: Liberal Classic
"libertarians" from tpaine, you're getting the wrong impression. Exactly my point. Why is it when the word libertarian is mentioned, I immediately have visions of a dogmatic, opininated anti law, anti government, porn and drug promoter, hateful, disrespectful, inconsiderate, pompous person who believes in tearing down any conservative gains the GOP makes? I almost think - "Oh no, watch out - I will be called stupid, ignorant, asked hateful questions."
The libertarian rhetoric I have come in contact with through FreeRepublic, Liberty Post and all the other anti sites does not reflect well on Libertarians.
It sounds more intelligent than DU but appears rather mean-spirited and hateful to me.
Of course, you and some others do not fit that description. Just the preponderence of it forms that impression.
996
posted on
08/27/2002 8:51:50 PM PDT
by
ClancyJ
To: Cultural Jihad
We conservatives have to wonder why you nay-sayers are even here. The owner has a plan in place, and since you don't want to participate it only makes you look like a DU type. Capisca? Wonder all you like, but you really shouldn't make the mistake of calling yourself a conservative as long as you advocate the direct opposite of conservative principles. Capisca?
To: Son of Rooster
LOL but point taken anyway!
To: Cultural Jihad
"We conservatives" - CJ
_________________________________
Whatta joke, CJ. You detest the restrictions the constitution puts upon your fundamentalist jihadic agenda:
Free Republic is a place for people to discuss our common goals regarding the restoration of our constitutionally limited republican form of government. If people have other agendas for FR, I really wish they would take them elsewhere.
Thanks, Jim
226 posted on 2/7/02 4:01 PM Pacific by Jim Robinson
999
posted on
08/27/2002 8:52:51 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: M. Thatcher
Terriergal is not a twit and you owe her an apology if you haven't already done so.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 961-980, 981-1,000, 1,001-1,020 ... 1,201-1,215 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson