Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
A gigantic airship (lighter than air) using an 'electric' propulsor could move at only very modest velocities.

I studied one such concept, by SkyStation international (CEO: Alexander Haig) which used a "Corona Ion Engine" invented by a UCLA physics prof named Wang.

Its 1400-Newton "Corona Ion Engine" developed about 314 pounds of thrust and was used to keep the blimp hovering above on spot on the earth for use as a communications platform.

It used solar cells on the surface of the blimp to develop power. I found that ~600 kW were potentially available, but they quoted only 50kW. This was laughably underpowered and would be soaked up almost entirely by the engine.

The engine approximated an "actuator disc" of aerodynamic propulsion theory. It was highly efficient (using little power per pound of thrust) but also could not develop high thrust levels, even if all 600 kW were available.

Just FYI, jets and rockets ("thermal engines") require roughly 20 kW (thermal) per pound of thrust. Non-thermal engines do somewhat better, but using electricity to move a giant blimp around would still be S - L - O - W.

--Boris

6 posted on 12/14/2002 7:50:19 AM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: boris
PS. The "jet power" of the Space Shuttle Main Engine is around six megawatts. Each. There are 3 of them on the Shuttle, and each develops 512,000 lb of thrust in vacuum. Its main hydrogen and oxygen pumps (just the turbopumps), each only a few hundred pounds in weight, develop about the same power as a railroad locomotive.

--Boris

7 posted on 12/14/2002 7:54:19 AM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson