Malarkey, boy. You try to quote a once famous Satanist and can't do it because you can't spell 'thou'. If you aren't even familiar with Spooner's book you shouldn't try to horn in on a discussion of an essay from it. Servant of nine winos under a bridge? Is that what your nick means?
LOL! That's funny.
Malarkey, boy. You try to quote a once famous Satanist and can't do it because you can't spell 'thou'. If you aren't even familiar with Spooner's book you shouldn't try to horn in on a discussion of an essay from it. Servant of nine winos under a bridge? Is that what your nick means?
Do you always start with gratuitous insults you pompous sack of bullshit?
I admit that I don't bother to spell check, but I was not quoting Crowley, but Rabelais. I think you will find that Crowley is still a famous Satanist, though dead. No one is horning in here, excepting your fluttering around your betters
I know who Lysander Spooner was, and what his positions were. Taking his theories on the invalidation of compacts seriously is pure Tin Foil territory. He and Ignatious Donelly are the two most notorious American crackpots of the period
Was the War between the States about slavery, NO.
Was Lincoln acting Constitutionally when he attacked the Confederacy, NO.
Does either of those facts make Spooner rational, NO.
So9
Satanist? Who's the Satanist? Spooner?