To: John Jamieson
Publish it here! Right. It took me 1 hour just to figure out how to get to it! Download Adobe etc. Ott states in one of the warrants that he says to DW(while retracing the trip)that he(Ott) hopes the searchers find her soon. DW supposedly says that the LE has done a very thourough job and so he thinks they will find her soon. Ott asks how soon, Dave and DW says "sooner than you think". This is after DW blurts out that the desert would be a good place to hide a body. These aren't the exact words. Do you think this is what Feldman was talking about?
984 posted on
08/16/2002 11:13:50 PM PDT by
Jrabbit
To: Jrabbit
What's the URL? Maybe I can figure out how to do it for you.
To: Jrabbit
No. In fact we've heard all that before, several weeks ago.
We also know these cops lied in the search warrant requests. Remember the one that claimed the motorhome was at DW's at 10:30pm on Friday night? Or that Brenda never told DW about the father/daughter dance so the only way DW could know was for Danielle to have told him? Cops just say whatever they need to to get the judge to sign it.
I'm pretty sure the real sealed info is a tape in DW's own voice, not some cop's notes or claims.
To: Jrabbit
Ott states in one of the warrants that he says to DW(while retracing the trip)that he(Ott) hopes the searchers find her soon. DW supposedly says that the LE has done a very thourough job and so he thinks they will find her soon. Ott asks how soon, Dave and DW says "sooner than you think". This is after DW blurts out that the desert would be a good place to hide a body. These aren't the exact words.
I wonder if this might be another red-herring in this case passed along to us courtesy of the SD PD and Jeff Dusek
The EXACT quote from in Feldman's handwriting IIRC, was QUOTE AS EXPLOSIVE AS A CONFESSION UNQUOTE
For the DEFENSE attorney to write this, would seem to me to be something that benefits HIS OWN case and not that of the PERSECUTION prosecution.
Given that Detective Ott has a "history" of falsifying evidence, I have to wonder if a LIE OF OMISSION may have occured here.
The original question by Ott (who has a history) may have been, 'We're so discouraged in our search for Danielle, some are almost ready to give up.' and DAW could reply with a a comment such as 'God willing and if prayers are answered, it could be sooner than you think.'
A little selective editing and voila ! fabricated evidence a l'Ott, cooked to perfection. Did it happen this way ? I dunno. But its a reasonable explanation.
And since the body was NOT found in the sand dunes or near Glamis or other places on DAW's road trip, his comment about where the body might be, is moot since the body wasn't there.
1,005 posted on
08/16/2002 11:35:56 PM PDT by
pyx
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson