Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
If you're not saying that the body is completely mummified, then what is your basis for saying that the flies would not have been attracted to the body until the coyotes or other animals got to it?
398 posted on 08/16/2002 12:43:04 PM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies ]


To: small_l_libertarian
The testimony:
Here's the news article about it
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/danielle/20020726-9999_1n26david.html

"Testimony from William Rodriguez, a private consultant, provided several scenarios to explain why, as the defense has argued, insects didn't reach the girl's body until two weeks after her parents reported her missing. "

"Taking into account all that information, Rodriguez determined that the victim could have been dead four to six weeks when her body was discovered Feb. 27.

But he said it's not an "exact science." He said there's no way to determine precisely when someone died, although he has spent his career searching for a methodology. "

"Dr. Brian Blackbourne, the county medical examiner, testified that the girl could have been dead from 10 days to six weeks when her body was discovered. "

"Flies aren't attracted to mummified bodies because adult flies can't chew and need soft places to feed, he said. When the eggs hatch into larvae, they also need something soft to eat, he said. " (Rodriguez)




don't forget that in testimony, he stated that if a rodent or animal chewed through the mummified skin, the bugs would be lying in wait..and would have entered once the skin was open as long as there was still moisture.

408 posted on 08/16/2002 12:49:47 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson