To: Rheo; Valpal1
185 posted on
08/16/2002 10:12:56 AM PDT by
mommya
To: mommya
I see your concern, mommya, but I'd take Brenda's statement with a huge grain of salt.
She doesn't say a thing without an ulterior motive.
Remember, she was recounting a conversation that happened after she decided to peddle her wares, er, Girl Scout cookies, several days after seeing her rich, single neighbor at the neighborhood bar. She brings along her two young children for 'cover.'
She invited herself in to check out his 'knobs.' Probably interrupted him doing work inventing more appliances for the medical use. All this while her children were helping themselves to a tour of his home and garden.
She took his perfectly innocent invitation to come back some time to use his pool and join in on barbeques with other neighbors, and twisted it into something sordid and dirty when she spoke to Damon on the phone. (Remember, two other neighbors testified to using his pool and backyard for fun, not dirty, actitivties.)
That poor girl's death and her activities before her death would be common knowledge in the local community.
Brenda wants DW to bear the consequences for her child's death, while taking absolutely no responsibilites for shirking her own motherly duties.
I don't take any of her statements at face value, including that one. Thanks for the opportunity to share my thinking on this.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson