To: JudyB1938
Is she the one who forgot to photograph the evidence before performing tests? Therefore there is nothing for the jury to look at showing the evidence as it was found? This is "the blood" evidence in totality, correct?
To: Bluebird Singing
I do believe you're correct.
Imagine! Also, showing up with a polaroid camera instead of a 35 mm, where the film could be analyzed later.
Don't those people ever watch Forensics TV to see how it's done right? (Yes, I'm being sarcastic)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson