Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JudyB1938
Is she the one who forgot to photograph the evidence before performing tests? Therefore there is nothing for the jury to look at showing the evidence as it was found? This is "the blood" evidence in totality, correct?
1,605 posted on 08/18/2002 1:12:23 PM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1603 | View Replies ]


To: Bluebird Singing
I do believe you're correct.

Imagine! Also, showing up with a polaroid camera instead of a 35 mm, where the film could be analyzed later.

Don't those people ever watch Forensics TV to see how it's done right? (Yes, I'm being sarcastic)
1,606 posted on 08/18/2002 1:15:32 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1605 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson