I agree...
"It is not up to the prosecution to be giving ANYONE credibility "
The prosecution did not hide the VD's past from the jury. My point was, their credibility was created by believing them when they said at some point during the investigation that there was NOT a legitimate reason for danielle's blood to be on the jacket, mh etc.. That's all I meant.
"And LE's job to collect ALL evidence to rule out possible other subjects - both scenarios in which Dusek and the LE faied miserabley. "
I think that is just a matter of opinion. I can't remember if you said you work in the criminal justice field or not. Your posts are always so good! Whether you do or not, don't you expect the prosecution to use what they get? There is no other explanation for all the transfer of evidence. And what about the child porn (assuming they'll find him guilty) what are the chances of finding a neighbor will all this against him?
freepmail..
I think it's a matter of fact as they did not test all of the blood found in the home to my knowledge nor all of the fingerprints
"I can't remember if you said you work in the criminal justice field or not."
No - I work in the medical field and have worked in trauma centers, funeral homes and with the county ME back home. Two of my older brothers are LE (a captain and a detective) and my cousin is an attorney - we have really racked up the phone bill dollars discussing this case! And there is no clear consensus between the 4 of us - except that all of the evidence and persons involved should have been investigated and NO ONE should have been cleared within 24 hours.