Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Mudd Refuses Sequester Plea: Westerfield Jury Verdict In Sep? (Aug. 16th Verdict Watch)
Union Trib ^ | August 15, 2002 | Jeff Dillion/Steve Perez

Posted on 08/16/2002 6:39:20 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge denies defense motion to sequester jury

By Jeff Dillon and Steve Perez
SIGNONSANDIEGO

August 15, 2002

Judge William D. Mudd addressed counsel on a motion by defense attorney Steven Feldman regarding media access to jurors in the trial of defendant David Westerfield at San Diego courthouse, August 15, 2002. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam from her Sabre Springs home, last February.  REUTERS/POOL/Dan TrevanArguing that media coverage was creating a "lynch mob mentality" that could pressure jurors to return a guilty verdict, the defense attorney for David Westerfield today asked the judge yet again to sequester the jury.

While the jury completed its first week of deliberations without a verdict, Superior Court Judge William Mudd denied the request and a related motion to "pull the plug" on television and radio coverage of the courtroom proceedings, but agreed to set aside a private room for jurors to take breaks. Defense attorney Steven Feldman had argued that reports suggested jurors felt like they were under siege, unable to leave their deliberating room, go to lunch or walk home without being watched or followed.

"We have no assurance that they are not be intimidated ... by the presence of the media," Feldman told Mudd during a morning hearing. "We can think of only one fair resolution to that: Get the jury out of harm's way."

 

'Broccoli heads'

He cited an incident earlier in the week in which radio talk show hosts from KFI-AM 640 in Los Angeles broadcast from outside the courthouse, waving stalks of broccoli around and reportedly calling jurors "broccoli heads" for being unable to return a quick guilty verdict.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of kidnapping 7-year-old Danielle van Dam from her family's Sabre Springs home on Feb. 2 and killing her. Jurors are in their sixth day of deliberations.

Lead prosecutor Jeff Dusek disagreed with Feldman's interpretations of the jury's complaints.

"Whether or not any guilty verdict in this case would be based on a siege mentality or the meida I think is pure speculation and utterly false in this case," Dusek said.

What the jurors had complained about was being watched all the time, he said.

"That hardly equates to being under siege," he said.

 

Trust in the jury

Mudd dismissed most of Feldman's concerns, saying that the jurors had only asked a bailiff to keep reporters a little bit farther away, though an alternate juror reported that he or she had been followed to his car.

Media coverage has diminished since the jurors began deliberating, the judge said.

"The synopsis programs on the two local TV networks are not in place," he said. "The talking heads are doing nothing but speculating about what the jury may or may not be thinking."

Mudd said there were no signs that jurors were being harassed by the public, especially since their names and faces haven't been publicized.

"We've all sat here and picked this jury, know their makeup and know their dedication to this cause," Mudd said. "I would prefer to think that any verdict they make in this case would be based upon the evidence."

Sequestering the jury also wouldn't protect them from any public reaction to the verdict, Mudd said.

 

'The activities of a few'

"The tragedy is, the majority of the people in this courtroom are abiding by the court's orders and working very hard to insure they, meaning the media, do not cause something to occur that is going to cause a mistrial," Mudd said. "Not all of them feel that way as is very apparent with the activities of a few."

Mudd took aim at two radio program hosts from Los Angeles who he previously described as "idiots."

"I suppose it's entertainment out of LA. I hope it stays in LA," he said. "The shows those two gentlemen put on made the court incredulous as to what they were attempting to do."

Mudd also announced:

 



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 1,741-1,743 next last
To: Hildy
Your living in San Diego has nothing to do with it. There's at least one other poster who also lives in San Diego and has arrived at the opposite conclusion you have. But then, of course, that poster has read the transcripts and listened to the testimony and followed the threads that have taken all of that apart bit by bit.

Until you have researched it out and studied it for yourself, I do understand why you think Westerfield is guilty and the Van Damns are pure as the driven snow. After all Nancy (who defended clintoon's sex life) said so! And so did John Walsh (who has just been outed as another doper pervert!).
501 posted on 08/16/2002 2:44:32 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: spectre
It will be similar to Peter Jennings the night of the Presidential elections when networks started calling Florida for Bush.
502 posted on 08/16/2002 2:44:32 PM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Were you as offended as I was, Spec?

Here's a man on trial for his LIFE and she's giving interviews about flying 5 hours for a haircut and a pedicure.

For heaven's sake.

No wonder CTV comes off as being so shallow... It is!
503 posted on 08/16/2002 2:45:48 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
"I still want to know why the FBI was involved from Day 1. The reason they got involved so quickly with Elizabeth Smart case is because police thought she could have been taken across state line, thereby requiring FBI. Who asked for the Feds? I am sure they were not justing driving thru the neighborhood and noticed some activity on the Van Dam's street and stopped to see if they could help."

That's a good question, KC. I've wondered, since it was reported that one of the detectives asked Denise, if PDVD was some kind of a spy, if steering of the investigation, away from the VD's, wasn't more the result of a highly placed Federal source, rather than local LE, as some here have speculated. Possibly FBI, CIA, or NSA and possibly someone closely associated with the VD's social circles.

I've never brought it up, because, as good a movie plot as it might make, I'm not convinced of its actual likelihood, myself. But, if it were somehow to be the case, it would account for both the bizarre (IMO) spy question - posed to Denise - and the very early interest shown by FBI.

504 posted on 08/16/2002 2:46:44 PM PDT by theirjustdue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: domestice
Yes, yes it is. Dusek says because he was banging her head against the headboard and his head through the sidewall while he raped her. And the porn made him do it.

I wonder why NOBODY in LE noticed the hole in the RV? Surely they couldn't have missed it?

How stupid is that? Mr. Dusek, paging Mr. Dusek. White courtesy phone for Mr. Dusek.
505 posted on 08/16/2002 2:47:00 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
You know Hildy, I conversate REGULARLY with SEVERAL people who live in San Diego and very near Sabre Swings. Most of them have HUGE problems with Dusek's case. They think David Westerfield is innocent.

Surely you are not implying that you speak for the whole of San Diego. Please let me know so that I may inform these other people that they need to change their opinions. Nice sheeple, get back in line.

BTW, we much prefer being called Stealth Ninja Freedom Fighters. How often must this be repeated?
506 posted on 08/16/2002 2:48:00 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Here goes the Westerfied is innocent people. I live in San Diego, believe me, I know this case inside and out.

Well aren't you the presumtuous one. Does living in San Diego give you some special way to know the case inside and out?

I happen to live in San Diego County and have immediate family in law enforcement. In fact, I knew about the swinging before it ever became public, but guess what..........I don't know any more about this case than everyone else who has followed the trial.

You're no one special and you know nothing more than the next guy. Disagree if you want, but get off the superior knwoledge bit. We all know better, Brunhilda.

507 posted on 08/16/2002 2:48:52 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Hildy; All
I do not live in the area as you do, so you may have more info than I have. But, if we were on the jury together, can you give me some evidence that DW did this? If you want to see DW convicted, how would you convince me? There is not one solid piece of evidence that ties DW to this crime IMO and I wouldn't be able to convict on what the prosecution has presented.
508 posted on 08/16/2002 2:49:33 PM PDT by tunneldiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
How do you explain the multi colored fibers all over her body but not found anywhere in DW's environment?

How do you explain the unindentified prints in the VD home?..especially the one on the desk next to her bed?

How do you explain the unidentified DNA on her multi colored blanket?

How do you explain the human blood on the garage floor that was came back w/non reportable results?

How do you explain the mattress pad and fabric headboard had none of her trace?

How do you explain that the dogs did not hit on the MH?

I have asked just a few questions that are part of my reasonable doubt..if you need to wait for Nancy Grace to call you back with answers, just ping me.

509 posted on 08/16/2002 2:49:36 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: All
presumtuous = presumptuous
510 posted on 08/16/2002 2:51:02 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
conversate ???

Argghhhh ... I hate it when prison slang becomes a part of our language.

Just color me old, I guess. But I do wish you wouldn't use those kinds of words. They give legitimacy to slime.

Oh, I almost forgot ...

Hugzz and Kizzez

:0) < Me laughing
511 posted on 08/16/2002 2:52:02 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 506 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez; ican'tbelieveit
It will be delicious to watch CTV come unglued..and tune them out forever.

Beth Karas was SOOOOO excited she had a real date?! A man took her out to eat?! Could it be because all she wants to talk about is her hair, her nails, her clothes...her, her, her??!

sw

512 posted on 08/16/2002 2:52:27 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
knwoledge = knowledge

Sheeesh.......Note to self: Never type fast.

513 posted on 08/16/2002 2:53:13 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
Actually the first time I heard it was from the bar tender at Dad's. During the brain trust's testimony.

Ditto for the expression "recreate" when referring to recreation. This gem was from a Ranger.

Ever wonder why they call it the Left Coast?
514 posted on 08/16/2002 2:54:27 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 511 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
"Brunhilda"...BWAHAHAHAHA!

sw

515 posted on 08/16/2002 2:55:03 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 507 | View Replies]

To: theirjustdue
Oh, didn't you read Kim's earlier rules? No wild speculating allowed on this thread. /sarcasm off
516 posted on 08/16/2002 2:55:14 PM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
"I wonder why NOBODY in LE noticed the hole in the RV?"

I asked that question the other day. If one were to accept Dusek's rape scene, there would be damage on the wall. The walls in RVs are very flimsy indeed.
517 posted on 08/16/2002 2:56:06 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
You took up talking like the people at Dad's. What's next? Swinging like people at Dad's?

[DUCKING!!!!!]

ROFL
518 posted on 08/16/2002 2:56:39 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
How in God's name do you know!??! Were you there that night...did you stumble upon the scene...or (gasp) did you have a hand in it? I USED to live in San Diego, but I would never dare presume someone's guilt or innocence based on my locale. Just because you live in the area doesn't make you privy to a different set of facts than the rest of us.

But since you obviously know the entire story here, please enlighten the rest of us as to some gigantic holes in the prosecution's story. How did Westerfield get the body from his house to the motor home, in broad daylight mind you, with no one noticing? How did he get into the VD home and leave no trace of himself? How did he dispose of the body while he was under 24/7 surveillance?

I'm on pins and needles awaiting your "answers."
519 posted on 08/16/2002 2:56:54 PM PDT by IrishRainy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: IrishRainy
It is my opinion that nobody can profess to know the real workings of the people involved in this case unless they were personal friends of the people in this case. hmmmmmmm Could it be that Brunhilda protesteth too much?
520 posted on 08/16/2002 2:59:26 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 481-500501-520521-540 ... 1,741-1,743 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson