Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Mudd Refuses Sequester Plea: Westerfield Jury Verdict In Sep? (Aug. 16th Verdict Watch)
Union Trib ^ | August 15, 2002 | Jeff Dillion/Steve Perez

Posted on 08/16/2002 6:39:20 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge denies defense motion to sequester jury

By Jeff Dillon and Steve Perez
SIGNONSANDIEGO

August 15, 2002

Judge William D. Mudd addressed counsel on a motion by defense attorney Steven Feldman regarding media access to jurors in the trial of defendant David Westerfield at San Diego courthouse, August 15, 2002. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam from her Sabre Springs home, last February.  REUTERS/POOL/Dan TrevanArguing that media coverage was creating a "lynch mob mentality" that could pressure jurors to return a guilty verdict, the defense attorney for David Westerfield today asked the judge yet again to sequester the jury.

While the jury completed its first week of deliberations without a verdict, Superior Court Judge William Mudd denied the request and a related motion to "pull the plug" on television and radio coverage of the courtroom proceedings, but agreed to set aside a private room for jurors to take breaks. Defense attorney Steven Feldman had argued that reports suggested jurors felt like they were under siege, unable to leave their deliberating room, go to lunch or walk home without being watched or followed.

"We have no assurance that they are not be intimidated ... by the presence of the media," Feldman told Mudd during a morning hearing. "We can think of only one fair resolution to that: Get the jury out of harm's way."

 

'Broccoli heads'

He cited an incident earlier in the week in which radio talk show hosts from KFI-AM 640 in Los Angeles broadcast from outside the courthouse, waving stalks of broccoli around and reportedly calling jurors "broccoli heads" for being unable to return a quick guilty verdict.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of kidnapping 7-year-old Danielle van Dam from her family's Sabre Springs home on Feb. 2 and killing her. Jurors are in their sixth day of deliberations.

Lead prosecutor Jeff Dusek disagreed with Feldman's interpretations of the jury's complaints.

"Whether or not any guilty verdict in this case would be based on a siege mentality or the meida I think is pure speculation and utterly false in this case," Dusek said.

What the jurors had complained about was being watched all the time, he said.

"That hardly equates to being under siege," he said.

 

Trust in the jury

Mudd dismissed most of Feldman's concerns, saying that the jurors had only asked a bailiff to keep reporters a little bit farther away, though an alternate juror reported that he or she had been followed to his car.

Media coverage has diminished since the jurors began deliberating, the judge said.

"The synopsis programs on the two local TV networks are not in place," he said. "The talking heads are doing nothing but speculating about what the jury may or may not be thinking."

Mudd said there were no signs that jurors were being harassed by the public, especially since their names and faces haven't been publicized.

"We've all sat here and picked this jury, know their makeup and know their dedication to this cause," Mudd said. "I would prefer to think that any verdict they make in this case would be based upon the evidence."

Sequestering the jury also wouldn't protect them from any public reaction to the verdict, Mudd said.

 

'The activities of a few'

"The tragedy is, the majority of the people in this courtroom are abiding by the court's orders and working very hard to insure they, meaning the media, do not cause something to occur that is going to cause a mistrial," Mudd said. "Not all of them feel that way as is very apparent with the activities of a few."

Mudd took aim at two radio program hosts from Los Angeles who he previously described as "idiots."

"I suppose it's entertainment out of LA. I hope it stays in LA," he said. "The shows those two gentlemen put on made the court incredulous as to what they were attempting to do."

Mudd also announced:

 



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,741-1,743 next last
To: small_l_libertarian
That's not true..while the testimony said they preferred a fresh body...they really require a moist environment.

The purpose of the mummyologist was to show that mummified skin can keep the internal organs moist..and even feldman himself confirmed that. (see transcripts above)

481 posted on 08/16/2002 2:06:54 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
And I had fun doing it too. :)

Oh my.....and you admit it????

482 posted on 08/16/2002 2:10:19 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
:) Cheap thrills..

483 posted on 08/16/2002 2:11:54 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Now hold on there a minute, Kimummy. I knew a mummyologist. A mummyologist was a friend of mine. Kimummy......you're no mummyologist.


484 posted on 08/16/2002 2:16:07 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay; spectre
I am not given over to cussing.......I'm not!

But these folks on ctv are making me so steamed, I have to mute them after only a few minutes!!

I wanted to rehear the testimony again......but having to wade through Nancy Grace, and even Catherine Crier is more than I can take.

IMO, they shred the truth with impunity!!
I doubt they even lose any sleep over it.

And goodness forbid, if & when ...occasionally....someone will come on brave enough to go against the grain
....(a guy was just on, ...his name is Jan something, and he's a public defender type).....
...but he sure sounded logical--while disagreeing with Crier)...she rudely cuts away from him & not only that, she tries to negate what he just said.

These people are BEYOND THE PALE!

485 posted on 08/16/2002 2:20:53 PM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
You are such a creative defense atty type of person. :)
486 posted on 08/16/2002 2:20:56 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
You are such a creative defense atty type of person. :)

If you only knew how wrong you are, but I've given up hope of that ever happening.

487 posted on 08/16/2002 2:24:48 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Actually!!!...there are two men....TWO....on right now, who are voicing EXACTLY what many of us are saying here!!

The same arguments!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Of course, Crier & the dame with her shut them up fast......

But they got to have their say!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

488 posted on 08/16/2002 2:26:06 PM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I'm just kidding of course...which helps at times. I know that you don't consider yourself anything but a person who wants justice and you think they gots the wrong man...

Gotta go...take care
489 posted on 08/16/2002 2:28:30 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kimmie, there is NOBODY who could give a definitive answer as to TOD in regards to mummification. That's why your "dude" put the first possible TOD BEFORE she was actually dead.

Even considering he has the proper data, he still must operate under a BROAD range of actual processes that react differently in any specific combination given. Just like a medical examiner does - approximate times of death, but no definite time of death - because the same natural forces affecting the mummification process also affect the rigor mortor process. Likewise, the mummy dummy can only give an approximate time of death. Since his honest testimony must reveal a broad range of time of death, his testimony is useless in placing an EXACT time of death.

I could be wrong. If I am, somebody please correct me. I am not a member of the "intelligentia".

BTW, I have a couple of mummified frogs. One is smashed flat. The other is a tiny tiny whole one. Kinda cool.
490 posted on 08/16/2002 2:28:54 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
Mrs. Marks...state ONE piece of evidence that would lead you to believe this.
491 posted on 08/16/2002 2:32:14 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
It's obvious Mrs. Mark has been reading these threads, that's why she said it. There is no way there is a one-liner for your question.
492 posted on 08/16/2002 2:34:58 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
C'mon, Judy, I'm sure you can pull it off! LOL

I believe in you. :-)
493 posted on 08/16/2002 2:35:39 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
I have a one-liner, but they'd banish me to the basement. (grin)
494 posted on 08/16/2002 2:37:50 PM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
=:-0
495 posted on 08/16/2002 2:38:51 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Since we have been debating the legitimacy of the mummy witness, how do you perceive his testimony?
496 posted on 08/16/2002 2:38:52 PM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: agarrett
Hi Drew,

< So, in the end, I don't think the porn will weigh heavily >

Isn't the supposed child porn the DA's motive for what DW is accused?
497 posted on 08/16/2002 2:40:03 PM PDT by domestice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
Here goes the Westerfied is innocent people. I live in San Diego, believe me, I know this case inside and out. Westerfield is guilty as all get out and for those of you who believe the Van Dam family had a hand in this tragedy I say, SHAME ON YOU.
498 posted on 08/16/2002 2:40:13 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
No, that was not the testimony. Here it is:

Haskell: I'VE SEEN THE GREEN BOTTLE FLY PHAENICIA SERICATA AND ANOTHER SPECIES RELATIVE OF THAT GREEN BOTTLE FLY, THEY COME IN ALMOST IMMEDIATELY. BUT AFTER THE FIRST DAY OR DAY AND A HALF OF DECOMPOSITION, WE DON'T SEE THEM ANY MORE IN THE ATTRACTABILITY AND THE BLACK BLOW FLY THEN COMES IN AND COLONIZES ON SUCCESSIVE DAYS BY LAYING EGGS. SO, YOU KNOW, THAT FLY, THE GREEN BOTTLE FLY, IS A VERY OPPORTUNISTIC -- HE HAS TO COME IN OR SHE HAS TO COME IN AND GRAB THAT FOOD RESOURCE IMMEDIATELY. THAT'S HER SURVIVABILITY FOR HER OFFSPRING. AND AFTER A PASSAGE OF TIME, I WOULD NOT HAVE EXPECTED PHAENICIA SERICATA TO HAVE BEEN THERE IF THE BODY HAD EXPERIENCED MUCH DECOMPOSITION AT ALL.

Q: AND YOU DID FIND PHAENICIA SERICATA THERE, DIDN'T YOU?

A: DR. FAULKNER DID OR DAVID FAULKNER DID.

Q:SO THAT'S INCONSISTENT WITH THE NOTION THAT THE BODY WOULD HAVE BEEN DEPOSITED SAY ON FEBRUARY 4TH OR FEBRUARY 3RD OR FEBRUARY 2ND, IS THAT RIGHT?

A ABSOLUTELY.
499 posted on 08/16/2002 2:40:23 PM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
"These people are BEYOND THE PALE"..

Not just the ones on CTV...

Catherine Crier is such a phoney witch. Have you noticed how they all have this sugar-sweet smile on their faces, as they say "OF COURSE DW is GUILTY"...but the Jury is just doing their job..not matter how long it takes." Yeah, right..boy are they STEAMED about it! :~)

Beth Karas, according to the article that was just posted, can't wait to get back to NY. Buying new clothes, getting a manicure and her hair done are HER top priorities. Getting DW convicted is a close second. Nancygrace is semi-retarded, she has the emotional maturity of an 11 year old. She really needs to lose that "whistle" of hers..

Court TV's 15 minutes of fame are all but over for me. MSNBC also reports on the DW trial, usually around 5pm CST..after CTV cuts to the HOT TV SHOW, (LOL) "The Profiler" which no one watches.

Not much longer, now, Gwennie. If the verdict is guilty, I won't watch them...BUT if it is an aquittal or a hung jury, it will be worth recording their reactions..:~)

sw

500 posted on 08/16/2002 2:40:28 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,741-1,743 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson