Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Mudd Refuses Sequester Plea: Westerfield Jury Verdict In Sep? (Aug. 16th Verdict Watch)
Union Trib ^ | August 15, 2002 | Jeff Dillion/Steve Perez

Posted on 08/16/2002 6:39:20 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge denies defense motion to sequester jury

By Jeff Dillon and Steve Perez
SIGNONSANDIEGO

August 15, 2002

Judge William D. Mudd addressed counsel on a motion by defense attorney Steven Feldman regarding media access to jurors in the trial of defendant David Westerfield at San Diego courthouse, August 15, 2002. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam from her Sabre Springs home, last February.  REUTERS/POOL/Dan TrevanArguing that media coverage was creating a "lynch mob mentality" that could pressure jurors to return a guilty verdict, the defense attorney for David Westerfield today asked the judge yet again to sequester the jury.

While the jury completed its first week of deliberations without a verdict, Superior Court Judge William Mudd denied the request and a related motion to "pull the plug" on television and radio coverage of the courtroom proceedings, but agreed to set aside a private room for jurors to take breaks. Defense attorney Steven Feldman had argued that reports suggested jurors felt like they were under siege, unable to leave their deliberating room, go to lunch or walk home without being watched or followed.

"We have no assurance that they are not be intimidated ... by the presence of the media," Feldman told Mudd during a morning hearing. "We can think of only one fair resolution to that: Get the jury out of harm's way."

 

'Broccoli heads'

He cited an incident earlier in the week in which radio talk show hosts from KFI-AM 640 in Los Angeles broadcast from outside the courthouse, waving stalks of broccoli around and reportedly calling jurors "broccoli heads" for being unable to return a quick guilty verdict.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of kidnapping 7-year-old Danielle van Dam from her family's Sabre Springs home on Feb. 2 and killing her. Jurors are in their sixth day of deliberations.

Lead prosecutor Jeff Dusek disagreed with Feldman's interpretations of the jury's complaints.

"Whether or not any guilty verdict in this case would be based on a siege mentality or the meida I think is pure speculation and utterly false in this case," Dusek said.

What the jurors had complained about was being watched all the time, he said.

"That hardly equates to being under siege," he said.

 

Trust in the jury

Mudd dismissed most of Feldman's concerns, saying that the jurors had only asked a bailiff to keep reporters a little bit farther away, though an alternate juror reported that he or she had been followed to his car.

Media coverage has diminished since the jurors began deliberating, the judge said.

"The synopsis programs on the two local TV networks are not in place," he said. "The talking heads are doing nothing but speculating about what the jury may or may not be thinking."

Mudd said there were no signs that jurors were being harassed by the public, especially since their names and faces haven't been publicized.

"We've all sat here and picked this jury, know their makeup and know their dedication to this cause," Mudd said. "I would prefer to think that any verdict they make in this case would be based upon the evidence."

Sequestering the jury also wouldn't protect them from any public reaction to the verdict, Mudd said.

 

'The activities of a few'

"The tragedy is, the majority of the people in this courtroom are abiding by the court's orders and working very hard to insure they, meaning the media, do not cause something to occur that is going to cause a mistrial," Mudd said. "Not all of them feel that way as is very apparent with the activities of a few."

Mudd took aim at two radio program hosts from Los Angeles who he previously described as "idiots."

"I suppose it's entertainment out of LA. I hope it stays in LA," he said. "The shows those two gentlemen put on made the court incredulous as to what they were attempting to do."

Mudd also announced:

 



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,741-1,743 next last
To: KnutCase
Common sense would say, "Leave the rope out of the act."

I guess Dusek is the answer to "How dumb can you get?"
301 posted on 08/16/2002 11:40:26 AM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
Your logic is irrefutable, and a welcome relief.

LOL

I spook myself sometimes, letting coincidences become cause-and-effect. I like that folks here manage to bring one another back down to earth, while constantly exploring new ideas. Sometimes simlutaneously. And humor sure doesn't hurt.
302 posted on 08/16/2002 11:40:42 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
The jury didn't cry. The alternates (two of 'em) did

And, the alternates are not allowed in during jury deliberation.

303 posted on 08/16/2002 11:42:52 AM PDT by Mrs.Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
< /yawn>

You're telling me?
304 posted on 08/16/2002 11:42:57 AM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
Oh yeah. It's nice and toasty warm safe here, but on "Smokey"...hot dog!

I wait.

sw

305 posted on 08/16/2002 11:43:00 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
They may, however, have questions about other evidence they disagree on.

If you believe the bugs any study of the other evidence is a waste of time. They apparently doubt the bugs.

306 posted on 08/16/2002 11:43:23 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Actually, Feldman begged the jury to view the porn, as well as DW's police interview. He begged them.
307 posted on 08/16/2002 11:43:33 AM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
Please send it. I'd like to see it. Thanks for researching it.
308 posted on 08/16/2002 11:44:16 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Little touchy today?
309 posted on 08/16/2002 11:44:34 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I have been told by an attorney, to NEVER talk to the police.

Given my reputation with the local Gestapo, they now know better than to even try to ask me questions, since I have a few of my own for them; ones they don't want to answer. All I have to do to get them to go away is to tell them I want to give them a copy of my RICO complaint as a citizens report of criminal activity and insist they give me a case number. After all, how can they investigate a crime without a case number? You'd think I had the plague! :-)

310 posted on 08/16/2002 11:44:43 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Thanks for the encouragement. What have I got to lose, eh?

Westerfield stands to lose his life. :-(
311 posted on 08/16/2002 11:44:46 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Would you please stop assuming that I support their behaviour?

Sure Kimbo.......just as soon as you stop implying that they are NOT liars and CAN be trusted.

312 posted on 08/16/2002 11:45:38 AM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
"So what's your prediction on the bug testimony?"

Good question.

I think that had the mummification not been brought into the equation, the defense would have won the bug battle. So I think if anything, the bug and mummy testimony will cause the jury to possible hang. What do you think?
313 posted on 08/16/2002 11:45:49 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
possible = possibly
314 posted on 08/16/2002 11:46:03 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Weren't the dw crowd accused of being a little touchy the other day because we were obviously falling apart because the jury hadn't come back with a "not guilty" yet?

Maybe the vd crowd is suffering the same affect.

315 posted on 08/16/2002 11:46:36 AM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Everyone knows they tried to hide their lifestyles via lying..what else is there to admit?
316 posted on 08/16/2002 11:46:46 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
How do you know they haven't discussed the bug testimony?

My premise is that if the bug testimony convinced them that Westerfield didn't do it then they wouldn't bother looking at the fiber evidence.

317 posted on 08/16/2002 11:46:47 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Let me again point out that, during the closing arguments, and beyond, we certainly had people in here who disagreed with us - and the threads rolled on.

But in the past couple of days, we're back to the same old thing.

And it always seems to start in the same place - though pointing that out is futile.
318 posted on 08/16/2002 11:47:01 AM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
It seems that all items the jury is requesting from the court are the things Feldman begged them to look at. Have they requested things that Dusek ask them to look at? Don't think so.
319 posted on 08/16/2002 11:48:05 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
They looked at Fiber stuf before the bugs. Why bother with fiber stuff is the bugs convinced them ?
320 posted on 08/16/2002 11:48:16 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,741-1,743 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson