Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Mudd Refuses Sequester Plea: Westerfield Jury Verdict In Sep? (Aug. 16th Verdict Watch)
Union Trib ^ | August 15, 2002 | Jeff Dillion/Steve Perez

Posted on 08/16/2002 6:39:20 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge denies defense motion to sequester jury

By Jeff Dillon and Steve Perez
SIGNONSANDIEGO

August 15, 2002

Judge William D. Mudd addressed counsel on a motion by defense attorney Steven Feldman regarding media access to jurors in the trial of defendant David Westerfield at San Diego courthouse, August 15, 2002. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam from her Sabre Springs home, last February.  REUTERS/POOL/Dan TrevanArguing that media coverage was creating a "lynch mob mentality" that could pressure jurors to return a guilty verdict, the defense attorney for David Westerfield today asked the judge yet again to sequester the jury.

While the jury completed its first week of deliberations without a verdict, Superior Court Judge William Mudd denied the request and a related motion to "pull the plug" on television and radio coverage of the courtroom proceedings, but agreed to set aside a private room for jurors to take breaks. Defense attorney Steven Feldman had argued that reports suggested jurors felt like they were under siege, unable to leave their deliberating room, go to lunch or walk home without being watched or followed.

"We have no assurance that they are not be intimidated ... by the presence of the media," Feldman told Mudd during a morning hearing. "We can think of only one fair resolution to that: Get the jury out of harm's way."

 

'Broccoli heads'

He cited an incident earlier in the week in which radio talk show hosts from KFI-AM 640 in Los Angeles broadcast from outside the courthouse, waving stalks of broccoli around and reportedly calling jurors "broccoli heads" for being unable to return a quick guilty verdict.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of kidnapping 7-year-old Danielle van Dam from her family's Sabre Springs home on Feb. 2 and killing her. Jurors are in their sixth day of deliberations.

Lead prosecutor Jeff Dusek disagreed with Feldman's interpretations of the jury's complaints.

"Whether or not any guilty verdict in this case would be based on a siege mentality or the meida I think is pure speculation and utterly false in this case," Dusek said.

What the jurors had complained about was being watched all the time, he said.

"That hardly equates to being under siege," he said.

 

Trust in the jury

Mudd dismissed most of Feldman's concerns, saying that the jurors had only asked a bailiff to keep reporters a little bit farther away, though an alternate juror reported that he or she had been followed to his car.

Media coverage has diminished since the jurors began deliberating, the judge said.

"The synopsis programs on the two local TV networks are not in place," he said. "The talking heads are doing nothing but speculating about what the jury may or may not be thinking."

Mudd said there were no signs that jurors were being harassed by the public, especially since their names and faces haven't been publicized.

"We've all sat here and picked this jury, know their makeup and know their dedication to this cause," Mudd said. "I would prefer to think that any verdict they make in this case would be based upon the evidence."

Sequestering the jury also wouldn't protect them from any public reaction to the verdict, Mudd said.

 

'The activities of a few'

"The tragedy is, the majority of the people in this courtroom are abiding by the court's orders and working very hard to insure they, meaning the media, do not cause something to occur that is going to cause a mistrial," Mudd said. "Not all of them feel that way as is very apparent with the activities of a few."

Mudd took aim at two radio program hosts from Los Angeles who he previously described as "idiots."

"I suppose it's entertainment out of LA. I hope it stays in LA," he said. "The shows those two gentlemen put on made the court incredulous as to what they were attempting to do."

Mudd also announced:

 



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,741-1,743 next last
To: ArneFufkin
Thank you for your comments. All opinions no matter how mental, are welcome.

sw

101 posted on 08/16/2002 9:10:38 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
I don't understand your post. What is confession time? I'm not Catholic, so I don't fully understand.
102 posted on 08/16/2002 9:11:37 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
On a different forum someone was going through ALL of the testimony from the trial and PH and compiled the timeline.

On the 4th they interviewed David for 9.5 hours, that I belive is in some news stories. The next day they took the trip.

I thought they went to the RV on the fourth. When they recreated the trip, they didn't take the RV.
103 posted on 08/16/2002 9:12:00 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
heh, heh

Who here is a juror?!
104 posted on 08/16/2002 9:12:22 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
That'd be a REAL HOOT.
105 posted on 08/16/2002 9:12:35 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I'm not the one posting pictures of nude men and women, Kim...I think that is you..just a guess..

I'll have to go back and review ALL my posts to see if I've posted any of those...LOL!!

sw

106 posted on 08/16/2002 9:13:21 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Jaded; Rheo
I have a question about the information that was posted last night.

IIRC, one of the techs (Dulaney?) placed Ott and Kelsey in the mh early on. This testimony was in the PH. Was it in the trial? Does the jury have that info? Does PH testimony become part of the trial record for deliberation?

Thanks,
Pinz (losing track of details, hurry, please, jury!)
107 posted on 08/16/2002 9:15:22 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
To the juror? Not you knutcase! (There are lots of nutcases but only one KnutCase.) It is an interesting idea.
108 posted on 08/16/2002 9:15:23 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Posting a pic to fres and you are no different than fres's silly little sex chair pics...

Let's just drop it..
109 posted on 08/16/2002 9:15:41 AM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Going to the store to buy a large fig leaf...be back later.
110 posted on 08/16/2002 9:16:21 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
Too funny, Knut. So glad you're here, on days like today.
111 posted on 08/16/2002 9:18:19 AM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Engineering Ping.
112 posted on 08/16/2002 9:18:21 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
Thankyou! A fig leaf is a good idea...blush, blush..

sw

113 posted on 08/16/2002 9:19:29 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

Comment #114 Removed by Moderator

To: ArneFufkin
Since you seen to be in the know, who killed Stephanie Crow?
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/reports/crowe/
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/reports/crowe/crowe_responses.html

Was Dale Akiki guilty?


How about Jim Wade?
http://www.ags.uci.edu/~dehill/witchhunt/ccla/pages/wade.htm
115 posted on 08/16/2002 9:22:38 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: spectre


116 posted on 08/16/2002 9:24:38 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian; shezza
Shezza, I had completely forgotten about the "plainly marked, highly visible, secret porn stash."

How do you explain that Neal testified that he found the porn hidden in exactly the same spot the police later found it? Is he in on the "planting"? Or could it be that that is where DW kept it hidden, to be ultimately found by Neal, then the police.

117 posted on 08/16/2002 9:25:37 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper


118 posted on 08/16/2002 9:26:47 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA; ~Kim4VRWC's~; spectre
It sure seems that one or all of you prefer these threads to include ongoing flame battles.

Jim has just set up a Smoky Back Room forum. If you want to engage in flaming while discussing things, then perhaps you should post these threads over there.

Let's keep the main forum threads (be they in News or General Interest) predominantly flame free please. Thanks, AM

119 posted on 08/16/2002 9:28:29 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Fresno, behave!! : )
120 posted on 08/16/2002 9:28:44 AM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,741-1,743 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson