Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Mudd Refuses Sequester Plea: Westerfield Jury Verdict In Sep? (Aug. 16th Verdict Watch)
Union Trib ^ | August 15, 2002 | Jeff Dillion/Steve Perez

Posted on 08/16/2002 6:39:20 AM PDT by FresnoDA

Judge denies defense motion to sequester jury

By Jeff Dillon and Steve Perez
SIGNONSANDIEGO

August 15, 2002

Judge William D. Mudd addressed counsel on a motion by defense attorney Steven Feldman regarding media access to jurors in the trial of defendant David Westerfield at San Diego courthouse, August 15, 2002. Westerfield is accused of the kidnapping and murder of seven-year old Danielle van Dam from her Sabre Springs home, last February.  REUTERS/POOL/Dan TrevanArguing that media coverage was creating a "lynch mob mentality" that could pressure jurors to return a guilty verdict, the defense attorney for David Westerfield today asked the judge yet again to sequester the jury.

While the jury completed its first week of deliberations without a verdict, Superior Court Judge William Mudd denied the request and a related motion to "pull the plug" on television and radio coverage of the courtroom proceedings, but agreed to set aside a private room for jurors to take breaks. Defense attorney Steven Feldman had argued that reports suggested jurors felt like they were under siege, unable to leave their deliberating room, go to lunch or walk home without being watched or followed.

"We have no assurance that they are not be intimidated ... by the presence of the media," Feldman told Mudd during a morning hearing. "We can think of only one fair resolution to that: Get the jury out of harm's way."

 

'Broccoli heads'

He cited an incident earlier in the week in which radio talk show hosts from KFI-AM 640 in Los Angeles broadcast from outside the courthouse, waving stalks of broccoli around and reportedly calling jurors "broccoli heads" for being unable to return a quick guilty verdict.

Westerfield, 50, could face the death penalty if convicted of kidnapping 7-year-old Danielle van Dam from her family's Sabre Springs home on Feb. 2 and killing her. Jurors are in their sixth day of deliberations.

Lead prosecutor Jeff Dusek disagreed with Feldman's interpretations of the jury's complaints.

"Whether or not any guilty verdict in this case would be based on a siege mentality or the meida I think is pure speculation and utterly false in this case," Dusek said.

What the jurors had complained about was being watched all the time, he said.

"That hardly equates to being under siege," he said.

 

Trust in the jury

Mudd dismissed most of Feldman's concerns, saying that the jurors had only asked a bailiff to keep reporters a little bit farther away, though an alternate juror reported that he or she had been followed to his car.

Media coverage has diminished since the jurors began deliberating, the judge said.

"The synopsis programs on the two local TV networks are not in place," he said. "The talking heads are doing nothing but speculating about what the jury may or may not be thinking."

Mudd said there were no signs that jurors were being harassed by the public, especially since their names and faces haven't been publicized.

"We've all sat here and picked this jury, know their makeup and know their dedication to this cause," Mudd said. "I would prefer to think that any verdict they make in this case would be based upon the evidence."

Sequestering the jury also wouldn't protect them from any public reaction to the verdict, Mudd said.

 

'The activities of a few'

"The tragedy is, the majority of the people in this courtroom are abiding by the court's orders and working very hard to insure they, meaning the media, do not cause something to occur that is going to cause a mistrial," Mudd said. "Not all of them feel that way as is very apparent with the activities of a few."

Mudd took aim at two radio program hosts from Los Angeles who he previously described as "idiots."

"I suppose it's entertainment out of LA. I hope it stays in LA," he said. "The shows those two gentlemen put on made the court incredulous as to what they were attempting to do."

Mudd also announced:

 



TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,001-1,0201,021-1,0401,041-1,060 ... 1,741-1,743 next last
To: dread78645
You always make me laugh. But that's to be expected out of a Sailor Boy. My baby son always makes me laugh, too. He served on the USS Nimitz.

One day, it suddenly dawned on me ... Hey, my son is a veteran, too! And he crossed Kadafi's Line of Demarcation. He was in possible harm's way. I made post haste to thank him for serving our country and told him what a hero I think he is.

So may I take this opportunity to thank YOU for doing the same.
1,021 posted on 08/17/2002 12:53:47 AM PDT by JudyB1938
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1018 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
Your welcome.
My best wishes, and may God bless you and your son.
1,022 posted on 08/17/2002 1:02:07 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1021 | View Replies]

To: JudyB1938
Since the receipts are a graphic, I can't upload to this thread from my hard drive. I can't even save it to my webpage and bring it in here, because Angelfire won't allow pictures to be posted like that.

Attached to Detective Torgersen's search warrant affidavit (from the pdf posted by clearvision in #807).

1,023 posted on 08/17/2002 1:39:57 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1019 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
Whoops, fooled by my browser cache!  I see what you mean about Angelfire ... Click here to view the receipts, with Angelfire's ads...
1,024 posted on 08/17/2002 2:15:16 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1023 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
Can see receipt is above post. What ever you did worked.
1,025 posted on 08/17/2002 3:39:38 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1024 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
"if you defost it, they will come"

That is profound...if the prosecution theory was she was killed and hidden in a freezer...then dumped in the desert...suddenly all the evidence makes sense. I don't see why others can't see this... way to go JJ! This is the most plausible explanation I've seen.

1,026 posted on 08/17/2002 5:23:30 AM PDT by teledude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1002 | View Replies]

To: pyx
And whose fingerprints were in DW's SUV?
1,027 posted on 08/17/2002 5:28:34 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 983 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
Looks like Westerfield immediately takes in his clothes after going to the club (or being near Brenda). At Dads on 1/25 takes in 3 garments for cleaning next day. At Dads on 2/1 and takes in 3 garments for cleaning on 2/4 when he gets back from trip. These were out of the SUV. There must be another receipt for the 2/4 morning drop off. Looks like the same clerk took in 1/26 stuff and 2/4 stuff.
1,028 posted on 08/17/2002 5:49:00 AM PDT by clearvision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1024 | View Replies]

To: clearvision
Thank you again for finding that document. That is going to make for some interesting reading.

I want to see the complete receipts (like the one for the black clothes) for the 1/26 trip and the 2/4 trips.

How many jackets and what kind are they?
1,029 posted on 08/17/2002 6:06:32 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1028 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
Hi, Dread. I just saw your DNA explanation from last night - that was very helpful, and easy to understand. Thanks for posting it.

Could I ask you a couple more questions? How did the DNA from Danielle's hair with root in the MH sink drain trap not match the DNA from her rib exactly? Holland the DNA guy said that it matched 12 of 13 loci.

I understand that DNA can degrade, and that could cause some "misses." (That info came from Holland - not my own understanding). How fast would that DNA from her hair degrade? If it takes more than just a few days, would that mean that the hair must be old? Am I missing something obvious that is going to make me go, "DUH!"?

Thanks.
1,030 posted on 08/17/2002 6:13:10 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1022 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
PFTHPPHHTTFTTT!!!! (Sound of coffee spraying all over my monitor.)
1,031 posted on 08/17/2002 6:15:49 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1020 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
There may be one witness who can place Danielle in the motorhome. Derek. We will never hear from him. It *is* possible that no one else ever saw.

Now, if the bloodhound found her scent in the MH, and found Westerfield's scent in the Van Dam residence . . .
1,032 posted on 08/17/2002 6:23:58 AM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 986 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim, all you did was prove my point.

They never proved it was blood. It was presumed blood.

They never proved that the fibers were an absolute match, just that they were similar. They did not prove that they were unusually unique, in other words, only Westerfield or Danielle could have had those fibers.

For all we know, Kim, you or I could shop at the same place and have the exact same fibers. It comes down to is Westerfield guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Defense is still up 4. All the defense needs to score is one point for reasonable doubt. So even you admit the defense wins the dogs, that is 1.

1,033 posted on 08/17/2002 6:33:50 AM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 817 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
"Screw You"?

And there are some on this forum who think they can't stand the remarks in Smokey Backroom?...Your's belongs in the gutter, Queenie.

It's easy for you to make these remarks behind the shield..here in the nursery.. isn't it?

Suggest you unloose that trash mouth of yours where we can properly respond, in kind...take it to the Smokey Backroom, coward.

sw

1,034 posted on 08/17/2002 6:43:03 AM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies]

To: wonders

Will Wonders Never Cease?  You are today's winner of the VD Thread 666 award...enjoy.

Major ritual "sabbat" dates on the Occult/Witchcraft/Satanism calendar.

This date sticks out....February 2, 2002    Danielle Van Dam, Age 7

 

DATE: October 31 NAME: *SAMHAIN; ALL HALLOWS' EVE; HALLOWEEN; NOVEMBER EVE WITCHCRAFT: Rituals to contact the dead SATANISTS: Sexual and blood rituals with animal or humans & animal or human sacrifice

DATE: December 21/22 NAME: YULE; WINTER SOLSTICE; WITCHCRAFT: Rituals celebrating the rebirth of the sun SATANISTS: Sexual rituals, animal or human

DATE: February 2 NAME: IMBOLIC; IMBOK; CANDLEMAS; OIMELE; LADY DAY; BRIGID DAY WITCHCRAFT: Sexual rituals; Celtic triple goddess Brigid honored. SATANISM: Sexual rituals, human

DATE: MARCH 20/21 NAME: Spring Equinox; Vernal Equinox WITCHCRAFT: This is a fertility sabbat. Pagans celebrate the coming of fertility of the earth; Sexual rituals celebrated by various groups. SATANISM: Orgies held; Animal or human sacrifices

DATE: April 30 NAME: *BELTANE; MAY EVE; ROODMAS DAY; WALPURGISNACHT WITCHCRAFT: Rituals focusing on the love between male & female. In fact, many pagan handcastings (weddings) take place at this sabbat. Rituals celebrating the fertility of the Mother Goddess (Earth) are carried out. SATANISTS: Blood rituals; Animal or human sacrifices

DATE: JUNE 21 NAME: SUMMER SOLSTICE; MIDSUMMER'S EVE; WITCHES: Bonfire rituals SATANISTS: Orgies; Animal or human sacrifices

DATE: AUGUST 1 NAME: LUGNASADH (Named for Celtic Solar god Lugh);LAMMAS DAY WITCHES: Harvest rituals SATANISTS: Animal or Human sacrifice

DATE: SEPTEMBER 21 to 23 (Date varies annually) NAME: AUTUMN EQUINOX WITCHES: Some covens have rituals reenacting Pluto or Hades (grim god of death) forcefully carrying of Persephone (young goddess of life) to the underworld. SATANISTS: Sexual orgies and or animal and human sacrifice.



1,035 posted on 08/17/2002 6:45:21 AM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: demsux
FresnoDA has a thread going in the Smokey Back Room for those who can't discuss this without resorting to personal attacks and flames. You may want to go there, because posts like that one aren't welcome here. Thanks, AM
1,036 posted on 08/17/2002 7:26:14 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 805 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
RE: Danielle in the RV- the DOGS did that. Go back and read the transcripts, She was not in the RV that weekend. Go further back, about Feb 8ish, FBI dogs were brought in. They did not hit and they weren't led by 180Frank but by qualified FBI handlers.

Watkins(DA) and Lawson(Defense) said they COULD NOT determine whether any of the girls were actually underage.

I really don't know what there is that you have such a hard time understanding. You really don't care about truth.
1,037 posted on 08/17/2002 7:26:32 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 986 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; dread78645; wonders
Not trying to pick on you, but don't dissection and dessication mean two different things? Maybe I don't understand how the terms are used in an autopsy.
1,038 posted on 08/17/2002 7:32:44 AM PDT by sunshine state
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 929 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
Well, I see you already answered my question (and much more succinctly too!).
1,039 posted on 08/17/2002 7:42:16 AM PDT by sunshine state
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1020 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
{Damon the long-term serial killer possibility] I'd love to have someone who is nice and logical point out to me how the connection is pure coincidence

Hey Mr. Dusek did that, remember? The 21 game theory of crimilinality. So many "coincidences" can not be a coincidence! Therefore Mr. Dusek would say -- Damon must have done it!

1,040 posted on 08/17/2002 7:49:57 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,001-1,0201,021-1,0401,041-1,060 ... 1,741-1,743 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson