Q: I WOULD LIKE TO DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION BACK TO FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR. DID YOU BECOME INVOLVED AT LEAST ON A PERIPHERAL MATTER IN THE DANIELLE VAN DAM CASE?
A: YES, I DID.
Q: DID YOU HAVE ANY INVOLVEMENT REGARDING A DRYCLEANER'S?
A: YES.
Q: WHAT WERE YOU ASKED TO DO?
A: I WAS ASKED TO TRY TO LOCATE ITEMS FROM A DRYCLEANING RECEIPT TAKEN OUT OF A VEHICLE. AND SO I WENT UP THERE TRYING TO LOCATE THE DRYCLEANER'S.
Q: DID YOU KNOW WHICH DRYCLEANER'S TO GO TO?
A: NO, I DID NOT AT FIRST.
Q: YOU HAD A RECEIPT FROM A DRYCLEANER'S?
A: YES.
Q: WHAT DID YOU DO?
A: I WENT TO THE AREA WHERE THE SABRE SPRINGS RESIDENCE WAS AND STARTED FANNING OUT THERE, GOING TO THE CLOSEST DRYCLEANER'S THAT I THOUGHT THE PERSON WOULD USE.
Q: LET ME SHOW YOU WHAT'S BEEN PREVIOUSLY MARKED AS COURT EXHIBIT 76. CAN YOU RECOGNIZE THAT PIECE OF PAPER ATTACHED TO THE ENVELOPE, SIR?
A: THIS LOOKS LIKE THE PHOTOCOPY THAT I HAD. I HAD A PHOTOCOPY OF THE DRYCLEANING RECEIPT, AND THIS LOOKS SIMILAR TO IT.
Q: THIS APPEARS TO BE THE ORIGINAL?
A: YES, I BELIEVE SO.
Q: DOES IT INDICATE THE NAME OF THE DRYCLEANER'S THAT IT CAME FROM?
A: NO, IT DOES NOT.
Q: WHERE ALL DID YOU GO LOOKING FOR THE DRYCLEANER'S?
A: ON TUESDAY I WENT TO FOUR DIFFERENT DRYCLEANER'S IN THE POWAY AREA CLOSEST TO THAT RESIDENCE.
Q: TUESDAY WOULD BE FEBRUARY 5TH.
A: FEBRUARY 5TH, YES.
Q: EVENTUALLY DID YOU FIND THE APPROPRIATE DRYCLEANER'S?
A: YES, I DID. ON FEBRUARY 6TH.