Was I hallucinating (no, not hello-cinating) that Torgersen testified that he "had received information that Twin Peaks might be the drycleaner to check" BEFORE he went driving around for a whole day?
On direct he said he had to search around.
On cross-exam he admitted that he had information to believe Twin Peaks was the place.
Another "Lie for the Prosecution".
Was I hallucinating (no, not hello-cinating) that Torgersen testified that he "had received information that Twin Peaks might be the drycleaner to check" BEFORE he went driving around for a whole day?And some posters here assumed that meant he received that information from Westerfield. However, from this article:
"Dry Cleaning Receipt Was Key In Westerfield Case, Court Records Show"
Excerpt:
Search warrants released Monday show that one of the detectives on the case used the same dry cleaner as Westerfield. Because of that, he was able to identify the origin of a dry cleaner's receipt, dated Feb. 4, taken from Westerfield's vehicle just two days after the girl turned up missing.