NOPE. The were sealed by co-prosecutor MUDD at the beginning of the case, and were only UNSEALED recently due to it being OVERTURNED by the APPEAL COURT on the basis that MUDD was a lying scumsucking low-life (wait, that's the wrong definition) MUDD was INTERPRETING a PREVIOUS RULING to STRICTLY (i.e. for purposes of winning the case).
Since they were not part of the trial, they jury has no idea (well, unless they are watching CTV or SDChannel, or read the SD-UT) they exist.
Just more appeal fodder.....