[UCANSEE2]

Wherever it came from, I still don't see the relevance of the porn. I understand that it is supposed to establish motive, but where is the evidenciary basis for that connection?

HERE IS THE MOST FALLACIOUS PART OF THAT.

The RAPE porn is supposed to show motive. Right? That DW RAPER Danielle?

Then why is he not even charged with RAPE?

How can RAPE PORN be motive if there was no evidence, no charge of RAPE?

CAN'T BE. Another STUPID attempt by Prosecution to win the case by hoping the JURY is as STUPID and the Dry Cleaning Clerk, the Pizza Partiers, The SDPD, and the MEDIA.

[small_l_libertarian]

Maybe they won't be able to put one over on this jury, U2.

I have read and re-read the juror profiles, and there's not one that screams "STUPID" to me. Some of them seem like they might be a little squishy, but none seem inherently dumb (based on their job description or lack thereof).

They sound like regular folks to me.

[UCANSEE2]

PING ))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

The ping list grows each day.

I Added " ican'tbelieveit,CAPPSMADNESS,WINODOG,Naturegirl,demsux to the list.

PLEASE WELCOME these fairly NEW names to the threads!!!!

carenot,kerensky,wonders, calawah98, Centaur,L.TOWM