Skip to comments.
Mudd Letters Opened To Public: Van Dam Jurors Continue to Mull and Ponder Westerfield's Fate! 8-15
Union Trib ^
| August 15, 2002
| Union Trib
Posted on 08/14/2002 9:29:21 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 921-930 next last
To: Jaded
Annette Peer..June 20.
Q. THE RESULTS THAT YOU DID OBTAIN FOR THE BLOOD FROM THE JACKET LAPEL, HOWEVER, ARE CONSISTENT WITH HAVING COME FROM MR. WESTERFIELD; IS THAT CORRECT?
A. THAT'S CORRECT.
321
posted on
08/15/2002 12:07:58 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: cyncooper
Thanks for taking time out of your busy schedule to lend another Voice of Reason here. They are needed on both sides of this issue. That's the only way the truth can come out.
To: JudyB1938
Oh yes, I've followed local trials very closely. Much more than this one and recorded them as well. I have a good sized library. Never seen any transcripts posted online, but the tapes are just as good, if not better. I can back them up time after time & replay. Which I've done many times.
Local trials haven't involved hair or fiber evidence however. Nor DNA. But a whole lot of direct evidence.
To: JudyB1938
Thanks for taking time out of your busy schedule to lend another Voice of Reason here. They are needed on both sides of this issue. That's the only way the truth can come out.Thanks, Judy. I'm outa here for awhile again, but had time this morning to review some articles and today's comments.
To: cyncooper
The Redden tape has been redacted and edited. Do we know WHEN it was redacted and edited? This is going to sound all tinfoil hat, but if the police/prosecutor knew that they had "stretched the truth" about what DW actually said, and that Mudd had covered their butts by sealing the affidavit, they would want to make sure that the interview tape matched their story, not DW's. But now the affidavits are unsealed (I want to see them, too) - so maybe he did tell Redden, and we just don't know it (yet).
To: small_l_libertarian
I've seen photos of BVD on the day of the abduction and she didn't look much better than she has in court.
To: Rheo
Q. THE RESULTS THAT YOU DID OBTAIN FOR THE BLOOD FROM THE JACKET LAPEL, HOWEVER, ARE CONSISTENT WITH HAVING COME FROM MR. WESTERFIELD; IS THAT CORRECT? A. THAT'S CORRECT.
Shaving accident?
327
posted on
08/15/2002 12:13:44 PM PDT
by
nycgal
To: nycgal
Could be...there were many DNA markers missing from the sample..wonder if it was really old also?
328
posted on
08/15/2002 12:16:20 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Jaded
Here is more:
Q DID YOU ALSO TEST I BELIEVE THE LABEL NUMBER WAS 48A, THE BEDSPREAD FROM THE MOTOR HOME THAT YOU HAD EARLIER DESCRIBED OBTAINING A POSITIVE PRESUMPTIVE BLOODSTAIN RESULT?
A YES, I DID.
Q WITH WHAT RESULT?
A THE D.N.A. TYPES THAT WERE RECOVERED WERE CONSISTENT WITH HAVING ORIGINATED FROM DAVID WESTERFIELD.
Q WHAT ABOUT ITEM 94D-3, THE JACKET STAIN FROM THE NECK AREA? I MAY HAVE ASKED YOU THIS, BUT IF YOU COULD JUST DESCRIBE IT.
A COULD YOU REPEAT THE ITEM NUMBER ON THAT?
Q SURE. 94D-3.
A NO D.N.A. TYPES WERE RECOVERED FROM THAT ITEM
329
posted on
08/15/2002 12:17:44 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: demsux
"Who is that woman in the montage (the one wearing the matching shirt as Danielle)? "
No, I have no idea & didn't focus on her too much.
To: the Deejay
I'm guessing that it's Barb Easton.
331
posted on
08/15/2002 12:19:08 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: small_l_libertarian
My understanding is the redaction was done during hearings involving the prosecution,
defense, and the judge.
Now I really am gone...
To: demsux
Easton is a big woman. Very tall & lots of big hair.
To: small_l_libertarian
We don't know what she looked like even a day before Danielle was gone. Stoned and excited for the activities to come the following night , Girls night out!
To: cyncooper
Thank you.
To: cyncooper; Jaded
In one affidavit, San Diego police Detective Terry Torgersen said Westerfield told detectives he submitted items for cleaning at Twin Peaks Cleaners the morning of Feb. 4.
CYNCOOPER: I say the affidavit and search warrant were not drawn up until 2/7 (I believe), NOT 2/4 or even 2/5. The detective first had to track down the drycleaners. The article about the affidavit states that DW told the police about the trip he made on 2/4. The article does not state DW disclosed the trip to them *on* 2/4. JADED, CYNCOOPER. HERE is a link to all the WARRANT NUMBERS:
CFAC
AND HERE IS THE LINK to some recent affidavits
WESTERFIELD DOCUMENTS
AND HERE is the SEARCH WARRANT FOR THE DRY CLEANERS. AND it is dated FEB 7th. (CYN!)
DRY CLEANERS SEARCH WARRANT
To: UCANSEE2
These aren't the recently unsealed affidavits tho...these have been there..IIRC
337
posted on
08/15/2002 12:28:15 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: cyncooper
Yes. I'd like to read the affidavit as well. It seems as if you're saying that what Torgersen said in the affidavit is just "confirmation" of what Det. Ott had already figured out from the receipt, ie, "Is Twin Peaks the dry cleaners you used?" DW - "Yes."
So, based on that, Torgersen can now state "DW told us he dropped things off at Twin Peaks dry cleaners on 2/4". Of course, that's pretty innocuous - and makes me wonder why the affidavit had to be sealed.
To: the Deejay
Thanks for the correction. Maybe I just THOUGHT I'd lost my last illusions.
My exposure has been limited to crime & forensics shows on TV, so I guess you can figure out why I got so upset with this trial.
To: demsux
Who is that woman in the montage (the one wearing the matching shirt as Danielle)? I think it is Brenda with long hair (and dark roots). Maybe taken during Disney World trip? Brenda did testify they got haircuts (plural) on Jan. 26th. Apparently Brenda got a haircut and dye job.
340
posted on
08/15/2002 12:31:09 PM PDT
by
Karson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360 ... 921-930 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson