Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nycgal
Could be...there were many DNA markers missing from the sample..wonder if it was really old also?
328 posted on 08/15/2002 12:16:20 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]


To: Jaded
Here is more:

Q DID YOU ALSO TEST I BELIEVE THE LABEL NUMBER WAS 48A, THE BEDSPREAD FROM THE MOTOR HOME THAT YOU HAD EARLIER DESCRIBED OBTAINING A POSITIVE PRESUMPTIVE BLOODSTAIN RESULT?

A YES, I DID.

Q WITH WHAT RESULT?

A THE D.N.A. TYPES THAT WERE RECOVERED WERE CONSISTENT WITH HAVING ORIGINATED FROM DAVID WESTERFIELD.

Q WHAT ABOUT ITEM 94D-3, THE JACKET STAIN FROM THE NECK AREA? I MAY HAVE ASKED YOU THIS, BUT IF YOU COULD JUST DESCRIBE IT.

A COULD YOU REPEAT THE ITEM NUMBER ON THAT?

Q SURE. 94D-3.

A NO D.N.A. TYPES WERE RECOVERED FROM THAT ITEM

329 posted on 08/15/2002 12:17:44 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson