Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
He is insinuating rape by bringing in the alleged "child pornography" depicting rape scenes.
401 posted on 08/14/2002 2:05:01 PM PDT by ican'tbelieveit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies ]


To: ican'tbelieveit; ~Kim4VRWC's~
He is insinuating rape by bringing in the alleged "child pornography" depicting rape scenes.

I think KIM may have missed this during dUSEK's closing statements.

Dusek didn't just insinuate rape. He described to the jury a scene where Danielle is lying on the bed in the MH, reaching for the cabinet moulding, and DW is lying on top of her, RAPING HER, and her head is banging the cabinets. BANG,BANG,BANG (this is Dusek, rapping his fist on the railing of the jury box).

DUSEK also told the JURY things like it doesn't matter HOW/WHERE/WHEN/WHY, it doesn't matter if there is no proof or evidence, THEY MUST FIND DW guilty JUST BECAUSE "WE KNOW HE DID IT".

410 posted on 08/14/2002 2:10:34 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson