[alisasny]

Why don't you try posting my ENTIRE statement, then I will respond to your inane post.

OK HERE IT IS IN CASE PEOPLE DONT KNOW HOW TO GO BACK AND LOOK THINGS UP:

I have never heard of him before...but as someone has previously noted, he sounds like a career politician - someone who follows the polls and media to form his conclusions.

Now will you kindly respond to that which you find inane?

Still strange to me that you could sum up a long time freeper activist based on his comments on this case when you yourself state you never heard of him before.

Looking forward to your attempt to spin your own comment.

[demsux]

First, I did not call my statement inane. I called your statement inane.

Secondly, I find it easy to "sum up" someone's character, when that someone does NOT back up their assertions with facts.

Thirdly, his opinion(s) seem based on media spin and polls regarding which way the wind is blowing with regard to this trial (since he had NO FACTUAL BASIS FOR HIS OPINION).

Finally, I could not care less what you think of me. You appear to be a "follower" of the congressman, that's fine for you, however I DO NOT rely on other people to speak for me.

BYE