To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
WE SEE AN12 INDICATION OF A FILE
LAST ACCESSED FEBRUARY 4, 2002 AT 4:4713 P.M., IS THAT RIGHT?14 A. YES, SIR. 15 Q. CAN YOU TELL ME PLEASE WHAT'S THE PATH THAT'S16 REFLECTED?17 A. YES, I CAN. IT'S 001 BACK SLASH C BACK SLASH18 WINDOWS BACK SLASH TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES BACK SLASH CONTENT19 PERIOD IE5 BACK SLASH G5ENGXQB BACK SLASH LESBIAN, AND THEN BO, I CAN'T READ THE REST OF IT.21 Q. CAN YOU TELL ME WHICH COMPUTER THIS SCREEN CAPTURE22 CAME FROM?
DW was in custody....who was accessing Lesbian Bordello?
193 posted on
08/14/2002 10:43:24 AM PDT by
Rheo
To: Rheo; small_l_libertarian
The witness defined surfing, and indicated they knew what porn surfing meant. Why didn't they just s p e l l it o u t..meaning, why didn't they say someone surfed rather than saying Viewed. The reader is left with the impression that all the defense is doing is "insinuating" that someone "may have" porn surfed. They DID confirm someone looked at email around 7pm that night. But not at 5pm. See what I am saying?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson