You mean these?
THE 2002 WESTERFIELD MODEL
Posted on 08/13/2002 10:12:33 PM PDT by FresnoDA
I would seem that way, but no. Blood pressure drops to zero upon death, so no bleeding. (Except in the case of post-mortem wounds made underneath the body, in which case there may be some blood leaking out due to gravity.)
So the odds are good that Billybob is a real congress-critter ?
You keep demonstrating your complete lack of knowledge concerning the facts in this case.
Where is the evidence of rape? Did I miss that testimony and/or evidence? Are juries now allowed to make their own facts?
It might be best for you to avoid such a forceful attitude, since we now all know that you haven't watched the trial.
Just a suggestion before you make more of a fo...........well never mind.
John,
I have followed this trial very closely. There was no testimony that her hair was in his bed. The partial thumbprint was actually on a cabinet; an upper one, if I recall correctly. The handling of the 'blood' on the jacket was poor, at best. No photo taken before it was cut out and apparently the entire alleged 1-3/16" spot was destroyed in testing and whether it was actually blood or not does not seem to be firmly established.
As for the 1/4" alleged blood spot on the MH carpet; once again, no photograph taken prior to cutting it out of the carpet, and the entire sample was destroyed in testing. Seems to be a bit of a problem with chain of control.
The work by the SDPD and the prosecutor appears to have been very sloppy. DW may have done it; but there is much that could lead a reasonable person to conclude that there is reasonable doubt. If DW did it, I don't think the evidence in this trial proves it. Even if convicted, I think he will get a new trial on appeal. If aquitted; it will be because of the bugs.
As for the porn; the prosecution's witnesses attempted to portray it all as being downloaded by DW when much of it was downloaded by his son. In this area, both the prosecution and defense lied.
Don
P.S. I always enjoy reading your columns on your web site and your comments on FR.
I agree.
How convenient it is, to see people who have never contributed to these threads for the last 6 months, suddenly come on board when they smell a guilty verdict.
It's safe and easy to go with the popular opinion, isn't it?!
sw
Yep.........very disheartening.
There's a perfect example of it right here. Someone jumps in wishing harsh punishment for a man whose trial he has little knowledge about.
The news media says he's guilty..........hmmmmmmmm.......must be so. I expected better from otherwise sensible people.
Are they of pre-pubescent girls or girls over 18 who are posed to look under 18?
I am sure this has been discussed but figured you could provide me an answer.
Has Nancy Grace stated for the record that they are actual photos of prepubescent girls?
Probably brought some hamburger to toss at Layla to keep her busy, while he grabbed the kid. Course, I was thinking that he actually "gassed everyone asleep" in the whole house, while he wiped his prints off of everything and kidnapped the child"..Then where did he hide his gas-mask? Doesn't matter, let's say "he just did". Works for the Prosecution.
sw
Ah yes and politicians want to be on the side of law and order...Amazing we didn't hear about the lie detector tests, you know the ones politicians don't want to take..oh and steam cleaning, bleach making the dogs puke and "matching" fibers...
You mean these?
Nancy Grace led the campaign to convict him the DAY he was arrested.
These "usually sensible" people on this forum who are taking us on.. should be asking themselves WHY so many of the rest of the "usually sensible" people are questioning DW's guilt?
sw
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.