No Decision From Westerfield Jury: Deliberations Continue Tuesday, August 13, 2002

KGTV ^ | August 13, 2002 | KGTV

[NatureGirl]

...we have still have two wonderful boys to bring up

"Oh, well. Best two out of three, eh?" < /sarcasm>

[Freedom2specul8]

I never said I didn't believe it, I said on a regular basis that I hope the rumors and allegations weren't true. He showed his true colors back in february to all of us.

[It's me]

Man alive...if this trial has taught me one thing, it's that San Diego is full of irresponsible airheads (Present company excluded, of course)...I'm embarrassed to have been born there.

---

Well! Not exactly full maybe half full though! I was about to take offense until I saw your disclaimer! ;)

[the Deejay]

I, also, posted when it happened, that RR & Co
were the ones behind the photo taken of Neal
Westerfield. The judge confirmed that today.

[fatima]

Amen

[Freedom2specul8]

WRT:neal's pic..that was awful wasn't it. They (we could also call them the rich rag company) are 1st rate idiots who are only out to increase ratings, get bigger bonus checks and to enflame the emotions of listeners. They aren't one anyone's side.

[demsux]

Regardless of what you or I think of RR, the FACT is that he was correct on certain issues with regard to the VD's lifestyle.

The swinging/swapping

Drugs (he mentioned cocaine and I suspect that is true...these people had been drinking all evening and are still up and at it at 2 am.

Brenda grinding away on the dance floor with all takers.

Garage door with lock reversed.

He was fed some "solid" information, which someone has since told him to "ignore".

[Jaded]

You know that's almost funny. There have been people who actually KNOW LE in and around San Diego, that heard it from LE themselves. Not Rick Roberts. Do you think KFMB sends out radiowaves that penetrate people's brains? Better put that tin foil hat back on.

Testimony about the lifestyle was limited by Mudd. There was testimony that they were trolling for sluts too. So, really, one must make an inference based on circumstantial evidence. Guilty.

When you have the time, explain Saint Nancy Grace. That'd be interesting.

[The Other Harry]

I am convinced that there was a whole lot more to their relationship.

If I was a juror, I would certainly suspect that to be the case.

To me, this part sounds like an outright lie:

Dusek: "Do you remember any "further contact" that night?"

BVD: "I can't remember, its been a long time, I've been through a lot. "

I think there is something more there. I'm not sure what that is, but I don't believe Brenda for a heartbeat.

[fivecatsandadog]

You're right... separate the articles and discard them in a manner not all that unusual, not to draw attention, and anywhere outside of your home territory. If Westerfield was trying to hide anything, why would he take his stuff to the cleaners and draw more attention to this "evidence"? I think Dusek is grasping at straws. Unless they can show absolute physical evidence that DW was in Danielle's bedroom on that night, I don't think the prosecution has a leg to stand on - that is, if the jury is thinking objectively.

[Jaded]

Sure they are. They are on THEIR side. It's the only one that counts. It's not like he's a brain surgeon either.

[Freedom2specul8]

If what people are saying is true, grace defended clinton. How can you explain her? GAG

"There have been people who actually KNOW LE in and around San Diego, that heard it from LE themselves--Jaded"

I believe the LE leak to a local radio station is a separate issue from LE spreading what they know to family and friends.

[Freedom2specul8]

Ditto--I was going to point out that they were on their own side, but figured I defined it.

[It's me]

Were you one of the ones on FR who use to praise RR's staff et al for all the details they exposed?

---

Oh Kim, don't start. Yesterday we had a nice day. Please don't bring in your irritations.

[theirjustdue]

Miz, please put me down for Monday, 8-19, 11:00 AM. TIA

[Steve0113]

"Ok...Now you're angry at DW! Seethe, dammit, SEETHE! Good Damon...here's a cookie."

I cracked up at that until I realized that, except for the cookie, his behavior was probably rehearsed just like that.

[Politicalmom]

It was lovely and peaceful, wasn't it?

[fnord]

FresnoDA has posted occasionally the initial RR show 'inside info' about the VD lifestyle. Going through it point by point, it has virtually all been proven out as true. Maybe he can post it again ...

However, the vast majority of leaks and rumors were decidedly anti-DW, but conversely, virtually all of it has proven to be FALSE. hmmmmm.

So this made him the major focus after the media clampdown, and LE started making threatening remarks about investigating 'leaks'.

It was also about this time that polls starting showing two things: increased name recognition for RR, and a decided majority thinking DW was guilty. Guess he figured out which way the wind was blowing ...

After his initial, mostly true, reports (the truth of which indicates actual insider info), he has been as hyperbolic and inaccurate as the rest of the media. This is the main reason for FReepers' change of attitude about him (despite what others may be claiming).

[the Deejay]

Mudd did say this morning, there's still an
internal investigation going on with the RR/kfmb
station. And I'm sure he meant the court is
doing the investigation.

(Stay tuned, folks!)

[Freedom2specul8]

I think he was partially correct--(no admission to regular sex parties--so we can only speculate--I'm not saying they didn't have them of course.)....I betcha that the leaks version was a lot more BORING than RR's version.

The LE leak KNEW that RR would trump up the charges against the vd's....because he has that kind of reputation.