Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Decision From Westerfield Jury: Deliberations Continue Tuesday, August 13, 2002
KGTV ^ | August 13, 2002 | KGTV

Posted on 08/12/2002 10:16:25 PM PDT by FresnoDA

No Decision From Westerfield Jury

Jury Could Take At Least A Week, Experts Say

Posted: 5:30 p.m. PDT August 12, 2002
Updated: 5:47 p.m. PDT August 12, 2002
SAN DIEGO -- Jurors completed a third day of deliberations without reaching verdicts Monday in the trial of David Westerfield, a former Sabre Springs man accused of kidnapping and killing Danielle van Dam.

alt
alt Danielle van Dam, David Westerfield
WESTERFIELD TRIAL
VERDICT COVERAGE
DANIELLE VAN DAM 1994-2002
alt
alt
The six-man, six-woman panel was handed the case Thursday after more than two months of testimony.

According to search warrant affidavits made public after six months under seal, Westerfield admitted to police that he dropped off bedding and other items at a Poway dry cleaners two days after Danielle disappeared.

The warrants and affidavits had been sealed since shortly after the girl's mother discovered her missing from her bed the morning of Feb. 2. Last week, the 4th District Court of Appeal ordered the documents unsealed.

Westerfield, 50, a self-employed design engineer, is charged with murder, kidnapping and possession of child pornography.

Video
alt
alt
Video Jury Has To Consider Question Carefully
alt
Click Here For Video Help
He could face the death penalty if the jury finds true a special circumstance allegation that the murder of the 7-year-old happened during a kidnapping.

The trial, which started June 4, included 23 days of testimony, 98 witnesses and 199 court exhibits.

Trial observers say the deliberations could come down to DNA vs. bugs -- DNA evidence that the victim was in the suspect's motor home versus testimony from defense forensic experts who said bugs on the girl's body indicated it had been dumped while the suspect was under police surveillance.

The alleged swinging lifestyle of the victim's parents, Brenda and Damon van Dam, also could factor into the jury's verdict.

Defense attorney Steven Feldman told jurors forensic evidence involving bugs on the victim's body proved it was "impossible" for his client to have dumped the body beside an East County road, where it was discovered Feb. 27.

The defense claimed throughout the trial that Westerfield was under tight surveillance by police and the media beginning Feb. 5, three days after the Sabre Springs girl was discovered missing from her bed.

 

 SURVEY
What decision do you think the jury in the David Westerfield trial will reach?
Guilty on all three counts
Guilty of kidnapping, murder
Guilty of possessing child pornography
Not guilty on all three counts
Hung jury

Westerfield was arrested Feb. 22.

Prosecutors contend the defense did not represent accurately the information provided by experts who study insect infestation of corpses.

Physical evidence -- including Danielle's blood on Westerfield's jacket and fingerprints, hair and fibers found in the defendant's motor home -- point to Westerfield's guilt, prosecutors said.

Feldman said the prosecution presented no evidence that Westerfield had ever been in Danielle's home. He noted that her parents testified to holding sex parties in the home, and said one of their house guests might have committed the crime.

Feldman also suggested that Westerfield could not have maneuvered his way through the darkened van Dam home the night of Feb. 1 without anyone hearing him seizing the 58-pound child.



TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,001-1,0201,021-1,0401,041-1,060 ... 1,101-1,104 next last
To: the-gooroo
Yes, Danielle's, Dylans and Unknown Contributor. DW excluded.
1,021 posted on 08/14/2002 6:48:15 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 969 | View Replies]

To: calawah98
Well, Freepers WERE honest. Once the jackals set to work (they are from virulent anti-dw forums)Freepers stepped up to even the odds.
1,022 posted on 08/14/2002 6:50:23 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 974 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Where could this be had? Ya gotta fight fire with fire.
1,023 posted on 08/14/2002 6:51:18 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 977 | View Replies]

To: fatima
For some people polygraphs are intimidating, so they don't do well. The only poly I had was suppose to be a 15 minute affair, in and out. Well, it took about an hour. My employer that hired me anyway, had a laugh about the level of honesty shown, because taking pens that you do not pay for and have not asked to take, is stealing....
1,024 posted on 08/14/2002 6:56:48 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 981 | View Replies]

To: fatima
The parents took a lie detector test. Brenda passed, Damon's was iffy. David Westerfield DID NOT TAKE a polygraph test. He was only interviewed by Redden. MY SOURCE IS ACCURATE.
1,025 posted on 08/14/2002 7:00:17 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 996 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
Zactly, thanks.
1,026 posted on 08/14/2002 7:01:21 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 997 | View Replies]

To: dread78645
dread, darling, it's a KEEPER!!!
1,027 posted on 08/14/2002 7:03:23 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1007 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Did you read that the jury requested the pics of Danielle L on Friday, along with the porn?

All notes have been signed by juror 10.

1,028 posted on 08/14/2002 7:17:40 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1027 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
What does this mean?
1,029 posted on 08/14/2002 7:23:04 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1028 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Goodness, you don't suppose they've been arguing over porn since Friday, do you? Ugh! Get to a verdict already! My heart can't take much more!
1,030 posted on 08/14/2002 7:26:12 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1028 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Do you have a profile on Juror 10?
1,031 posted on 08/14/2002 7:30:29 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1028 | View Replies]

To: KnutCase
Juror #95 in the pool. A male who has a 7-week-old child and works as a certified public accountant. He believes the death penalty is a deterrent in certain cases and a legitimate means of punishment.

(From courttv.com)
1,032 posted on 08/14/2002 7:32:00 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1031 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Had not heard that. Hmmm.
1,033 posted on 08/14/2002 7:32:38 AM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1028 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian; KnutCase; Jaded
So, do you think they were just comparing the real life pics against computer pics to determine if he is a perv?
1,034 posted on 08/14/2002 7:35:40 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1032 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
I could be mistaken, but didn't Susan L take the pictures of Danielle L? Then sent them via email to DW to print out? In that case, why would they need to compare anything? (And if I'm wrong, please correct me.)
1,035 posted on 08/14/2002 7:37:20 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1034 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
The only reason that child porn is part of this trial is because they need something for a possible motive. Without the porn there really is absence of motive for Westerfield, ergo a weaker case.
1,036 posted on 08/14/2002 7:41:33 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1034 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
yes, Susan L took the pics and emailed to DW to print.

Judge Mudd excluded them but said the jury could request.

Are they trying to determine if the only real life pics are porn?

1,037 posted on 08/14/2002 7:44:01 AM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1035 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Did you read that the jury requested the pics of Danielle L on Friday, along with the porn?

All notes have been signed by juror 10.

My take is juror 10 is the foreman.
And they're arguing about why a 50 year old man who likes large breasted women would be attracted to a 7 year old girl.

1,038 posted on 08/14/2002 7:45:52 AM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1028 | View Replies]

To: Rheo; KnutCase
I'm gonna go with KnutCase on this one - I think they're trying to decide whether there's actually a motive here. (I hope so, anyway.)
1,039 posted on 08/14/2002 7:46:01 AM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1037 | View Replies]

To: small_l_libertarian
Could this mean Susan L could be charged with accessory to murder? That's a stretch.
1,040 posted on 08/14/2002 7:46:09 AM PDT by KnutCase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1035 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,001-1,0201,021-1,0401,041-1,060 ... 1,101-1,104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson