To: Rheo
Just heard Chris Matthews on MSNBC--
He seems angry over the DW jury. He says: it seems like a case of "common sense vs reasons for possible innocence" He thinks that the jury has by duped by a slick defense lawyer. How's that for pressure aimed at a non-sequestered jury..
So what's the message-to the jury-Your taking too long.. Your verdict should be guilty just send him to his death and be done with it. Don't worry if he's innocent. We the nation, all know that he is guilty because we follow common sense, we cannot be duped... We weren't there to here the evidence, but that's OK you've been duped.
671 posted on
08/12/2002 9:51:40 PM PDT by
juzcuz
To: juzcuz
Just heard Chris Matthews on MSNBC--Sorry to hear that...they ought to call it "softball"...I never have liked him or his show...pandering to whatever is blowing in the wind
FWIW, I think the same about O'reilly, whorealdo, paula and the rest of the "smiling" faces.
Best source of news, IMO, is Free Republic
674 posted on
08/12/2002 9:56:26 PM PDT by
demsux
To: juzcuz
Chrissy is a buffoon!!
Has there been any media head out there that is rational or honest enough to really study and discuss this case??
This jury has had a very difficult time, a man's life is at stake as well as justice for a little girl and the media has done everything it possibly could to see that he is convicted.
Mudd, you should have sequestered this jury..you knew the facts, you knew the media lies were everywhere...the jury cannot ignore it all.
679 posted on
08/12/2002 10:02:20 PM PDT by
Rheo
To: juzcuz
Actually tonight on our local ABC affiliate they had a segment on the trial. Sheesh, must have been a slow news day in Houston.
680 posted on
08/12/2002 10:04:19 PM PDT by
Jaded
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson