Date Graham got latent prints from MH. Now, was there a previous time that he got Danielle's. You said you were corrected, what did they tell you was the correct info?
I am not trying to grill you, Just want to find out the 'real' info.
Sometimes I have people correct me,and it turns out they are not correct either.
Jeff Graham went to the MH on 4/17 as he noticed the horizontal cabinet had not been dusted and he wanted to check for the earring back, on a hunch.
He then pulled 16 latents from various surfaces....thereby ruining the original theory starter that DW wiped down the MH.
OK, the print was found on the first dusting. There could be all sorts of problems with it. The first problem I notice is that they claimed not to have a Danielle print with which to compare at that time, but they stopped dusting the MH when they found this print. So how did they know it was Danielle's? Why didn't they dust on and get all the prints?
Then the guy returns, supposedly to be more thorough(he had a hunch, no doubt). Thing is, by the time he returns, they have rehydrated Danielle's hand. So did anyone outside LE make some record of the print they found the first time? Could he have planted a print from the rehydrated hand where the original(in this theory,non-matching) print was? Why did he have time to go get some more prints for the heck of it, but not have time to compare unIDed prints from the Van Dam home? etc...
In a more direct respose to our convo: the print was supposedly discovered long before the body.