[Krodg]

I have have followed this trial on several forums and they each have people who see the blood evidence and exclude everything else. Each forum also has people who, after hearing the testimony and seeing the evidence, have reasonable doubt. I find it hard to believe a juror going into deliberations with reasonable doubt would now be swayed by another juror's opinion.

This is what I base my prediction of hung jury on. I may well be wrong.

[MizSterious]

Informal verdict pool: What's your best guess for when the verdict will come in? (actual verdict prediction optional and not recorced)

The winner(s) get to be called "winners" and the right to say "I told you so;" we're still negotiating about "neener neener neeners."

So far, we have:

Small-l-libertarian - Monday (today)
MizSterious - Wednesday
Mrs. Liberty - Thursday noonish
Krodg - Friday morning

If this thread gets real long, you might want to send your choices via freepmail or post them on the Refugee site--often I quite reading them when they're very, very long.

[small_l_libertarian]

Good observations, Krodg. I hadn't thought about it that way, but you're right. No one could convince me to vote guilty now, no matter how strongly they felt about it, because I have reasonable doubt. Period. I bet the jurors are very much like us - divided, but each side will probably stay put. You're pretty smart!