To: sawsalimb
I was thinking along those lines myself, especially since Lawson was able to pretty much prove that at least some of the porn was Neal's, without Neal having to say so himself.
Here's how it worked for me - Lawson says some of the porn is Neal's, Neal says it's not his. I believe in my heart of hearts that Neal lied on the stand - at least the anime/hentai porn is his. He's the anime collector/fan/club member/video renter. So, I have to throw out what Neal said, and accept what Lawson proved.
I think that Feldman made his point clearly without damaging Westerfield's family any more than it already is. Does that make sense?
To: small_l_libertarian
Yeah,that makes sense,especially that part about the anime. A fifty-something mechanical engineer with a secret bent for watching Japanimation late at night when no one can see him is a little bit over the top,as far as I'm concerned.
To: small_l_libertarian
Yes, I thought Feldman did an excellent of getting to the jury through Lawson that the porn was Neils. Neil lied on the stand and Feldman proved it. The anime was looked at about every two weeks. Gee, I wonder who that could have been??/sarcasm
55 posted on
08/12/2002 8:35:11 AM PDT by
gigi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson