To: the Deejay
I thought Dumsh@t tried to convince us that DW stood in the corner of her room for over an hour. Let me think about this.
Uh huh, man in his fifties been drinking all night (holds that bladder well. What concentration) stands perfectly still (no finger prints where he supported himself. Oh what fortitude) has watched porn and is lusting after his next victim (no heavy breathing or panting to wake the victim. Dumsh@t watches too many silent movies) smothers the child in her bed (no screams no struggle and no blood. He is a neat freak!) and silently carries her barely breathing body (while he is panting from exertion) from her home while leaving someone else's fingerprints and D N A.
The first half of his scenario is so ludicrous, why go to the next step???
432 posted on
08/12/2002 4:38:16 PM PDT by
Krodg
To: Krodg
He escapes down the hallway covered with pictures on the wall and furniture in the way, in the dark, and down the dark stairway. All with an "edgy" dog looking for him. All of this in a house with a first class burglar alarm.
Give me a break.
To: Krodg
Dumsh@t is just that. I cannot understand why the entire jury hasn't come to that conclusion by now and delivered a verdict of Not Guilty.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson