[gigi]

This has been bothering me,
Dusek made a big deal in his closing arguement about DW's statement to police that he had never been invited to the VD's house and how suspicious that statement was.
I checked the statement and this is how it goes.

Redden: Now have you ever been in the Van Dam's house? For any reason, whether parties or have they ever been -

Westerfield: I have never been invited.


I hardly find that suspicious. He was just answering the question as it was asked. Talk about twisting things to fit!!! Dusek is pretty twisted!

[small_l_libertarian]

I-hate-Dusek-I-hate-Dusek-I-hate-Dusek-I-hate-Dusek.

To me, that man symbolizes everything wrong with our judicial system. He's a completely out-of-control prosecutor who not only twisted the defendant's statements to make him look guilty (in a death penalty case, which is just morally outrageous), but flat out lied to the jury when he said he didn't know what questions to ask Faulkner.

BULL$#!+! He has personally used Faulkner's testimony to put men in prison. What a sick individual. He's willing to do something he knows is wrong, just to get a "win," which could very well lead to the death of a man.

Then the BANG-BANG-BANGING on the jury box to incite the jurors' passions to convict this man of raping a child. Oh, wait - he's not charged with raping a child. Guess that doesn't matter, though, when you're going for the win.

I hate him I hate him I hate him I hate him....

[Lauratealeaf]

I hardly find that suspicious. He was just answering the question as it was asked. Talk about twisting things to fit!!! Dusek is pretty twisted!

Good one Gigi! Thanks for posting that statement in its context. It seems that Dusek will do anything to convict! I join the Hate him club!