Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: the Deejay; gigi
OT:

We think one of our cats is part Maine coon. He spends every morning on the hallway rug sprawled out, trying to bite our ankles. He's so funny and he's done it every since he was a tiny kitten.

He just wraps himself around and playfully bites and bats at our ankles.

Never does it in the afternoon. Is that like the 'tripping' behavior you're describing?

We now return to all the VAn Damned, all the time, starry Nasty Grace. LOL
189 posted on 08/12/2002 1:20:10 PM PDT by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: pinz-n-needlez
Had no idea what a Maine Coon was and had to go look it up. Those sound like such fun cats! (I just have plain old Florida yard cats.)
192 posted on 08/12/2002 1:23:51 PM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: pinz-n-needlez
"He just wraps himself around and playfully bites and bats at our ankles."

Yep. My Maine Coon had those traits since he was a kitten.

194 posted on 08/12/2002 1:26:07 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: pinz-n-needlez
We had a part "Maine Coon" cat too, very large, and quite a character. Beethoven would BOX our legs if we didn't feed him soon enough. And then there were his criminal tendencies: we often said, if there's such a thing as reincarnation, this cat was a godfather in another lifetime.
199 posted on 08/12/2002 1:30:21 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: All
Let's get down to basics.

In order for the Prosecution to prove their case they have the following:

(1) 1 partial print in the MH.

(2) 1 blond hair found in the lint trap of the sink in the MH.

(3) 1 spot on the carpet by the bathroom in the MH containing DNA matching (?)Danielle's.

(4) 1 spot on the jacket recovered from the Drycleaners containing DNA matching (?)Danielle's.

This is the WHOLE of the EVIDENCE the PROSECUTION has. PERIOD.

Now, how much of this is valid?

How likely is it that the LE's/Investigators/DA's office would 'plant' the evidence?

I find it really funny that all of the above evidence wasn't found until AFTER DW was THE CHOSEN ONE. Until after police had a manner to obtain false evidence (prints,DNA, etc)

OR AM I WRONG?

Was the PRINT in the MH discovered before or after recovery of Danielle's body?

Before or after LE's dusted Danielle's room and said they found 'NONE OF DANIELLE's PRINTS' in her own bedroom?

Was the 1 blond hair found before or after Danielle's body was found?

Was the spot in the MH found before after her body was found?

What about the fact that the DNA comparison was done from a sampling from Danielle's underwear?

Was the DNA taken from the MH, and from the 'jacket' really ever compared to Danielle's DNA from her body.

I believe that they compared Danielle's DNA to Brenda/Damons to ID the body. But did they go back and match that to the tests done on jacket/carpet/underwear?

Everyone assumes that the jacket was in the MH. What if it wasn't? Police didn't find it there. Is the jacket they tested the one that usually was left in the MH ?

If not, would that be better/worse for DW?

208 posted on 08/12/2002 1:39:07 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: pinz-n-needlez
We think one of our cats is part Maine coon.

Cool cats, but I want a MANX!

361 posted on 08/12/2002 3:43:07 PM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson