Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: small_l_libertarian
I am confused about the jacket issue.

It seems the police claim the 'reciept', which would normally be accepted as PROOF in a court of law, is somehow 'wrong' because it doesn't jive with what the police want to prove.

Others have said it would appear the police went to the dry cleaners, picked up DW's clothing items, then went and 'put' the DNA on his jacket, so they could have some PROOF. Problem is they got the wrong jacket and had to come up with an explanation for why the receipt for that particular jacket shows it was taken to the dry cleaners on 01/26.

Some would argue that DEFENSE should have made a big deal out of this. I think the point was made by defense.

When you have the clerks giving conflicting (or appearing to be conflicting ) testimony about the computers(?) being UP/DOWN , and the cops saying that the receipt date is wrong because the computer that was UP/DOWN did it wrong, there isn't much to do as DEFENSE except to expect the jury to see the obvious.

177 posted on 08/12/2002 12:59:04 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2
Problem is they got the wrong jacket and had to come up with an explanation for why the receipt for that particular jacket shows it was taken to the dry cleaners on 01/26.

This is the part I'm not sure about. I know that A jacket went to the cleaner's on 1/26. A "sport jacket" went on 2/4. How can we know if they're the same jacket, or if two different jackets, which is which?

Maybe the obvious confusion will be enough! I, however, have a real problem with the "sport jacket" description. I would never think to call that green jacket a "sport jacket." Maybe it's just a Florida vs. California dialect kind of thing, but here, sports jackets are what men wear over a shirt to go out to dinner. That green jacket would be just a "jacket." Maybe even a "coat."

But if it isn't the same jacket, where's the other jacket?
180 posted on 08/12/2002 1:06:45 PM PDT by small_l_libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2
Some would argue that DEFENSE should have made a big deal out of this. I think the point was made by defense.

The defense has already made a big deal about it, the feds are investigating, betcha a bunch of money. They just can't say it in court.

Eventually, Poway will be renamed Westerfield. Or Sh*tville, or whatever DW wants, because he will own San Diego county when all is said and done. Or he will be murdered by the same cabal of crooked LE that framed him in the first place.

There have been many times I have wondered if the trial is even legit. Like maybe the falsified eveidence was caught early on, and the trial is part of the investigation. Dusek was just having too much fun, unchecked, the banging, the rope, please.... "I don't have to prove it"

Some LE perps in SD County are going to jail for a long long time, if they are lucky.

351 posted on 08/12/2002 3:34:57 PM PDT by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson