Replies

I still have a problem with the DNA on the JACKET.

Feldman had the RECEIPT for the item of clothing known as the JACKET that police got the DNA from. This RECEIPT shows 01/26, I believe, as the date.

There was another jacket taken in on Monday 02/04.

Now, Prosecution and police say the RECEIPT is WRONG. How can a receipt be wrong ?

WHY IS IT in this case that PHYSICAL evidence is TRUE, RIGHT if it supports the DW GUILTY case, but the same type of PHYSICAL EVIDENCE is WRONG, INVALID if it supports DW NOT GUILTY ?????

How can a COURT accept PROOF if the police get to determine when an ITEM is RIGHT/WRONG?

HELP me OUT. Am I missing something here, or is it obvious the SD DA, LE's, (and maybe LE's across the whole US, all LE's in state,local,national gov't) are edging towards totalitarianism???? Towards a POLICE STATE, a POLICE RUN SYSTEM where only WHAT THEY 'SAY' is the TRUTH?

"Towards a POLICE STATE, a POLICE RUN SYSTEM"

History says this kind of out of bounds law-and-orderism comes on now and again. Ask most Australians and some folks from the state of Georgia about where their forefathers came from. They were swept off the streets and cheap gaols of London and other English cities and towns and permanently deported for the slightest named infraction.

Besides, in my humble opinion, we are post-peak on that law-and-orderism and the social momentum is against it. That is, we are seeing the death throes of a fairly long period of this media-stoked-excessive-law-and-orderism. I believe it actually ran out of fuel back around 1980 and has been climbing on momentum, hitting apex in 2001.

Are we sure that the 1/26 receipt is for THE jacket? I really can't remember anymore. I know that there is A jacket on 1/26. And there is A "sport jacket" on 2/4. Are you saying that the sport jacket is really a sport jacket (like a blazer-type thing)?