Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Intellectual Content of Star Trek
The Texas Mercury ^ | August 2002 | Hank Parnell

Posted on 08/10/2002 12:36:14 AM PDT by sourcery

One night I was sitting at home innocently minding my own business, the TV on with the sound down as I prefer it, and I happened to look up and see Captain Christopher Pike (Jeffery Hunter) in that original pilot episode of Star Trek. (For you purists, this was the one they reused the pilot in, the 2-parter called "Menagerie.")

And now there he is, battling some big Mongol-looking guy with bad teeth on this Other Planet that's got this real fancy castle and ringed planet like Saturn painted in the background. And it occurred to me: why were there always planets with big Mongol guys with bad teeth fighting with battle-axes on all those Star Trek shows?

And let's just say I go to one of these planets with these giant Mongol guys, and I have a laser gun or phaser beam or whatever. Why, if I'm one of these Star Trek guys, do I always end up fighting with them hand-to-hand, and get my velour pajama shirt all artistically ripped and torn? And why don't the giant Mongol guys just chop me up with their axes, especially when I'm just a little phaserless Earth runt in velour pajamas?

I guess it's supposed to show how tough Earth men are, that they can throw down their phasers and fight hand-to-hand with giant gap-toothed Mongols on another planet and always come out on top with only their velour pajama shirts ripped strategically.

Later—or was it earlier?—I was watching this other episode about this giant tinker-toy spaceship that turned out to be run by this ugly-looking baby with a really annoying laugh. Remember that one? A high-caliber mental exercise, if ever there was one.

And it was then, right then, like I was shot with a diamond bullet in my forehead, as Marlon Brando said in Apocalypse Now, that I realized what a truly intellectual experience Star Trek is. Or was.

I began to ask myself a sober and serious question: why did I ever like this show, even as a kid? Was it because it was the only thing of its kind on at the time, and I didn't know any better? Hmm.

To go boldly where no man has gone before would, obviously, be an impossible task for the late, but unlamented, Gene Roddenberry, at least not without splitting an infinitive. Clarity in language is necessary for precision in thinking. Star Trek got off on the wrong foot from the very beginning.

Now one of my favorite episodes is called "Arena." It's loosely based on a real science-fiction short story of the same name by Fredric Brown, and it has this really neat alien starship commander who's a lizard-man with eyes like golf balls. I was never quite sure how or what he was supposed to see with those golf-ball eyes; but he wore a really snazzy caveman costume, sort of a laminated leopard skin. And I'm watching this today and I'm thinking, "Yeah, do I wear my leopard skin, or my velour pajamas, when I go to captain that starship?"

Better put in a call to Versace—oh, shucks! Like Gene Roddenberry, he's dead, too.

Nobody ever wears a spacesuit in a spaceship on a space show on TV. Why is that, do you reckon? Okay, I think maybe Buck Rogers in the 25th Century did, once or twice. Erin Gray, who played the slinky Colonel Wilma Deering opposite Gil Gerard's Buck, occasionally wore a thing that looked like it might have been a space suit, I don't know. (Didn't look too bad, did it? No.) But then they had that damned robot. "Beedeelee-beedeelee-beedeelee; t-that's all, B-Buck!" (Choice role for Mel Blanc, too, eh?)

But back to Star Trek. I guess it's no secret now that, as the seasons wore on, William Shatner had to start wearing a truss under his velour pajama shirt to keep his gut from hanging out. Leonard Nimoy published several books during and after the series, with titles like I Am NOT Spock, followed by Well, Maybe I AM Spock, and finally If I'm Not Spock, I'm NOBODY! But I never read any of those books; though a guy I knew once did have a book of Nimoy's poetry, which was especially hilarious under the influence of certain drugs.

True enough, by the end of my teens, I was totally disenchanted with the original Trek. Was it just the little things that I instanced in those comic-book parodies of the show that I wrote and drew in high school? All those planets that looked like ancient Rome, Chicago in the 30s, or Nazi Germany? Was it the fact that this was supposed to be the 23rd Century, and they still couldn't cure Sulu's acne? ("Old Zits," as I used to call him.) If there were no more nationalities, and everybody spoke the same language (even, conveniently, all the aliens), why did everybody have those weird accents, especially McCoy, Scotty and Chekhov? Chekhov could hardly speak in an understandable fashion: "Keptin, ve are beink hailt by an awien wessel." As Miss Uhura ("whose name means 'freedom'!") might ask, "Say what?"

Yes, it might have been those rather obscene youthful parodies that killed Star Trek for me. It is always such an easy show to lampoon mercilessly. (Or, to use old Gene's formulation, "to mercilessly lampoon.") You never knew when you'd find the plot of an old movie shamelessly ripped off, like The Enemy Below with Robert Mitchum and Curt Jurgens. Or find a bunch of really stupid ideas for aliens, like giant disembodied brains or glowing blobs of "mental energy", or tunneling rock-creatures who were not only "good mothers", but intelligent, no less. Star Trek had a lot of rock-creatures; one time one of them turned into the likeness of old Abe Lincoln. I'm sure that's something a rock-creature could, and would, want to do. Aren't you?

I kept waiting for one to turn into Jeff Davis, or maybe Nathan Bedford Forrest; but, alas….

How about those "acclaimed" episodes, eh? Like where McCoy went back in time and saved goody-goody Joan Collins from being killed, and that allowed Hitler to win World War Two? Broke Kirk's heart to let old Joan get run down like she was supposed to. I was only 12 or 13, but I hadn't seen anything that stupid since that Outer Limits episode a few years before about the future soldier brought back in time who kept calling the housecat "C.O." Could it be merely a coincidence that they were both written by Harlan Ellison, perhaps the most pretentious non-talent in all of science fiction?

My favorite highly acclaimed but really stupid episode, though, was "Amok Time," by the most-acclaimed non-talent that science fiction has ever produced, the vacuous Theodore Sturgeon. My parody of that was called, "Spock Gets Horny." I should probably spare you the obscene details, shouldn't I? Probably. It was pretty racist and sexist and no doubt homophobic, even though the queers were never mentioned. Typical, in other words.

I will say that, at the end, they all had a good laugh at Spock's expense, as they usually did in the series itself. In my parodies, I had a thing on the bridge there at the science station like a toilet bowl for Spock to stick his head in, ostrich-fashion, when everybody started laughing at him.

Reason and logic were almost always ridiculed on Star Trek. Almost always. Ever notice that? Emotion, passion, "faith" were always extolled; reason and logic shown to be empty, inadequate, and worthy only of derision and mockery. I found that offensive then, as a boy, and I find it even more so now, as a man.

We humans need not fear losing our emotions. Show me an animal that doesn't feel, and I'll show you a dead animal. It's logic and reason we have in very short and apparently extremely limited supply; hence this exhortation to passion over reason always seems to me perverse, and self-flagellant, to say nothing of supremely delusional and suicidal.

But I'll confess, there are a couple of episodes I like. One is called "A Taste of Armageddon," by writer Robert Hamner. This is a very clever show about two planets locked in a 500-year war which they fight "virtually," using computers—and march their casualties off to suicide stations! This is a wonderfully novel idea, and just the sort of stupid, delusional thing you could actually see human beings convincing themselves to do at some future date, for the very reasons expounded in the show: to "preserve" civilization, to deal with our "killer instincts" rationally.

(Rationally, you would think that if you had killer instincts, and you found them appalling and self-destructive, you would try to thwart them somehow, not exercise them in a vain and pointless manner; but then, I often wonder if what I mean by "rationality" is a completely different thing from what others mean. Others seem to think rationality means only the ability to rationalize—that is, to use "reason" in the service, or rather self-service, of the emotions, which is hardly the "superior" position!)

Kirk, of course, puts an end to this nonsense, and in a fashion I approve of—by blowing up their suicide stations and their computers, leaving them open to the real thing. And there is also that truly wonderful business of "General Order 24," which Kirk gives Scotty at one point, and which essentially means, "Wipe the bastards out!" I often wonder how that little apocalyptic directive "fit in" with the later almighty and sacrosanct "Prime Directive", which Kirk's gutless, emasculated successor, Little Man Picard, the Cosmic Social-Worker, couldn't bring himself to violate on a technicality.

And there is in this episode a genuine message, which is that war is a serious business that should never be undertaken lightly; effete, bloodless civilized guys should leave it to savage hot-blooded barbarians like James Tiberius Kirk—who nonetheless always managed to be enough of a man to avoid making it, whenever and wherever he could. Kirk may've been a jerk, as I called him in those youthful parodies; but he was at least a man, not a bloodless corpse like Jean-Luc Picard, who was stuffed so full of his own phony self-righteousness that the rotten reek would've gagged the viewer, had we been able to smell him.

The other episode I really like highlights one of Star Trek's best attributes, female costume design. That one is "Mirror, Mirror," the parallel-universe "imperial" episode. Spock with a beard! The costumes really make this. Jerome Bixby's script is passable, but no real empire ever worked like this, and no navy or space fleet could function as this one is depicted, not for long, anyway. But there is also a wonderful irony to Spock's piratical bent; and my favorite scene is early on, when he requests that a crewman present him with the little torture-device they all carry around so that their superiors can use it on them when need be. Spock demands: "Your agonizer, please."

That's our ever-"rational" Mr. Spock: always polite, even when he's behaving like a Nazi.

But check out the costumes in this episode, seriously. Those bare midriffs are intriguing. Miss Uhura ("whose name means 'freedom'!") looks downright foxy. And I love those thigh boots and ceremonial dress daggers. That is class TV-show spacewear, folks!

(Another thing I always liked was that loud ROARING sound the Enterprise made as she passed through the vacuum of space. Did I mention that? When of course she wasn't swishing along at warp speed. Swish!)

Female costume design was often all a Star Trek episode had going for it. Nobody ever sat through "Paradise Syndrome" just to hear William Shatner yell "Miramanee!" at the top of his lungs; no, it was that cute Italian chick, Sabrina Scharf, in that little Indian get-up, that made that one worthwhile. Even Mariette Hartley went around in a fur bikini under her polar clothing during an ice age in one episode. Ah, "Spock's Brain", an episode originally written as a joke, but which they filmed anyway! Thigh boots, miniskirts and halter tops. Is this space travel, or what?

Which brings me to a Congressional law I'd like to see passed. I'm not generally in favor of laws, since I regard a law as being just a gun pointed at somebody's head, and I figure if you're going to point guns at people's heads, you'd better have a pretty damned good reason for it. But in this case I've got a good reason; and the heads this law would point a gun at are those pointy little butthead types in Hollywood. In fact I think all my readers should get with me behind this bill, and let's all do our best to enable this legislation.

I call it "An Act To Improve the Quality of TV Sci-Fi Shows." It will require that all female cast members on a TV sci-fi show must wear either:

a: a miniskirt (micro-miniskirt; nothing longer than would be worn by Ann Coulter)

b: a space bikini (preferably a thong space bikini), or

c: a clinging diaphanous gown.

(Legal note for Constitutional scholars: "space bikini" herein defined as "any bikini worn by a female humanoid going into, passing through or coming from outer space.")

Now my friends I guarantee that the watchability of TV sci-fi will improve dramatically as soon as my legislation goes into effect. In fact, right now I demand that all new Star Trek franchise shows depict female Vulcans in nothing but thong space bikinis—preferably studded black-leather thong space bikinis. This should go into effect immediately for that chick Jolene Blaylock who plays the decidedly mammalian female Vulcan on the new Enterprise show. Thigh boots would be good, too. Can't go wrong with thigh boots, in my opinion. Thigh boots and a thong space-bikini. You can't tell me that wouldn't be a vast, paradigm-shifting improvement to that show. Hell, they could let Scott Bakula wear a dress if they wanted—he probably misses one from his days on Quantum Leap anyway.

And speaking of self-righteous sacks of shit, let's skip over Richard Dean Anderson's character on Stargate SG-1 and go right to that walleyed bottle-blonde bitch who pretends so badly to be an Air Force major and a physicist. (Ouch!) For her I recommend the bare-midriff look—micro-miniskirt and halter top, in appropriate military colors and stylings, of course.

You just don't realize, sometimes, do you, just what a big difference these "little" things can make!

That is, unless of course you still cling to the delusional pretense that there's some sort of "intellectual" content to these shows, as is stubbornly pretended in the case of Star Trek.

Hank Parnell


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
LOL ... I've got a copy of "Killdozer" ... it's the best asteroid-inhabited-by-an-evil-blue-alien-intelligence-lands-on-an-island-and-possesses-a-Cat-D9-bulldozer-and-fries-and-squashes-unsuspecting-construction-workers movie ever made! LOL! ... got a few other ones that were campy that I liked from back then ... "Gargoyles" (Bernie Casey and Scott Glenn!) ... "Satan's Triangle" (Kim Novak and Doug McClure) ... and finally "The Horror at 37,000 Feet" with Buddy Ebsen and William Shatner ... these films are a hoot!
21 posted on 08/10/2002 3:12:25 AM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Emotion, passion, "faith" were always extolled; reason and logic shown to be empty, inadequate, and worthy only of derision and mockery

That's the trouble with tribbles. . .

---

Flyer

22 posted on 08/10/2002 3:17:07 AM PDT by Flyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Hilarious article. I must dissent with the author's opinion on Stargate SG-1. I'm working my way through the first season on DVD and I kind of like it. The blond Captain (she must get promoted to Major in a later season) does get on my nerves sometime.
23 posted on 08/10/2002 3:56:28 AM PDT by jalisco555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadhead
Am I the only one on this thread to remember "Tom Corbett, Space Cadet"

I never saw the tv show but I read all the books when I was a kid. Boy, did I want to grow up to be him!

24 posted on 08/10/2002 3:57:48 AM PDT by jalisco555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Gene Roddenberry discribed Star Trek as "Wagon Train" set in the stars. That is all he was trying to do.
25 posted on 08/10/2002 3:59:38 AM PDT by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandfleaCSC
But what about Deep Space Nine? Except for the first couple of seasons, the show was about fighting off a suicidal and unrelenting enemy who worshipped a false god. Parallels??? Pretty good writing and direction on the show too. IMHO, it was one of the best Sci-Fi serials to date.

Yes, Deep Space Nine was the best of the spin-offs. Very little PC BS.

26 posted on 08/10/2002 4:04:43 AM PDT by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
I am invoking FreeRepublic General Order 24: Any posted article that mentions Ann Coulter must be accompanied by pictures of Ann.

FR has 23 general orders more worthy of note then this?

27 posted on 08/10/2002 4:21:10 AM PDT by Freebird Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
FR has 23 general orders more worthy of note then this?

I think you've hit on a great thread of its own. We need to codify the "25 FR Rules of Acquisition" or "The 25 FR General Orders."

28 posted on 08/10/2002 5:53:49 AM PDT by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Click HERE for another FR thread a long, long time ago on this very topic, in a galaxy far, far away..
29 posted on 08/10/2002 6:04:54 AM PDT by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marajade
I think the last seasons of DS9 (my favorite of the ST franchise) were in response of the very strong showing made by B5 with the overall series theme concept. Even television can be improved by competition (unless it's a race to the basement currently being run in "reality" shows.)
30 posted on 08/10/2002 6:18:15 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: leadhead
Who's the most pretentious non-talent in all of science fiction?
Everyone except Issac Asimov.

I would disagree with this.
Fredrik Pohl is quite conservative, and a Grandmaster of Sci-Fi.
I would also include Greg Bear, but he is quite hard core Sci-Fi. More Sci then Fi.

-Maigrey-
32 posted on 08/10/2002 6:49:24 AM PDT by willieroe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: willieroe
And I have to throw in Robert Heinlein. (Although I admit his work hasn't translated well to either the small or big screen.)
33 posted on 08/10/2002 7:37:57 AM PDT by Jonah Hex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Bobby777
... these films are a hoot!

Try to find "Killer Klowns From Outer Space" to add to that collection... :)

34 posted on 08/10/2002 7:53:34 AM PDT by forsnax5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jonah Hex
I have to throw in Robert Heinlein. (Although I admit his work hasn't translated well to either the small or big screen.)

You are correct - there hasn't been a single film based on any of Heinlein's works that I would walk across the street to see. Somebody could make a mint if they could do a successful trilogy of the events in "Time Enough for Love" and/or the Future History. Out of all the Heinlein books I've seen butchered on the screen, this one IMO has the best possibility of being made into something watchable.

Peter Jackson is doing a fine job with Tolkien's source material; if he gets antsy for a project in the future, maybe he'll take this one on.

35 posted on 08/10/2002 7:54:28 AM PDT by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: zhabotinsky; marajade; Tijeras_Slim
I agree that the final seasons of DS9, the continuous plot lines, the Dominion War, were a direct steal from the Shadow-Vorlon War and the Earth Civil War in B5. But more accessible. A problem B5 always had was that like a soap opera you just couldn't start watching it without having a long time fan explain to you the plots and secrets and relationships. This was a series where a casual comment in season 1 would rebound with devastating force in season 4.

The difference that always struck me is that the ST universe was one without resource constraints. The entire Federation Fleet is wiped out in battle with the Borg and the episode airily concludes with the statement that it will be rebuilt in six months (?!). Did Japan recover from Midway in six months ? Not just the ships and planes were lost but all those irreplaceable crack pilots. In B5 the core issue is President Clark's "Empire of Earth" policies vs the desire for freedom by the outer colonies. Central government vs local government resource allocation conflicts. The way politics actually works.

Also the role of religion. B5 always had its own religion. The mysterious, awesomely powerful Vorlons disguise themselves in powered suits because, as Kosh explained, "Everyone would recognize me". And the gradually explained timeless war between the Vorlons with their order and obedience ideology and the Shadows who foment war and chaos in service to their Darwinian ideology. The Bajoran mythology is a direct borrowing of Sinclair-Valen from B5.
36 posted on 08/10/2002 8:03:50 AM PDT by Tokhtamish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
An episode I truly despised about ST-TNG was the one where they reintroduced the Romulans.

First the Enterprise found this capsule of frozen 20th century people they reanimated. One of them was a stock capitalist who kept demanding to "call his office", as if his old company were as eternal as the Catholic Church. He threatens to use his influence to get Picard fired, not comprehending that his rolodex of bigshot friends are all dead. What does Picard do ? He personally goes to him and pleads with him to stay off the intercom. Who is the captain of that ship ? Who is in charge ? Kirk would have thrown his ass into the brig which would have been the correct thing to do with someone disrupting ship functions.

The capitalist is a self-important fool who does not understand that his power and wealth are all gone and Picard is incapable of enforcing discipline.
37 posted on 08/10/2002 8:23:10 AM PDT by Tokhtamish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zhabotinsky
And I won't even go into the anti-semitic overtones of the Ferengi, short, greedy, funny-looking dishonest guys with big ears, noses and bad taste.

??

I love Quark the Ferengi and his timeless wisdoms (my favorites are Rule of Acquisition #59 "Free advice is seldom cheap" and Rule #13 "Anything worth doing is worth doing for money"!

Unfortunately I am afflicted with a congenital lack of talent for making money hand over fist, so Quark and his compatriot PELGAR, the famous Internet advice columnist, are exactly what this tiny-skulled hew-mon needs to keep the bill collector from kicking down my door.

38 posted on 08/10/2002 8:29:16 AM PDT by tictoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: longshadow; PatrickHenry; Junior; VadeRetro
Saturday morning ping!
39 posted on 08/10/2002 8:33:12 AM PDT by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
You think that the old Star Trek was bad?

I must confess that I was a real fan, collected every episode, knew them by name had favorites and not so favorite...

Got my daughter hooked on it (her favorite was Devil in the Dark but then she read Charlottes Web 37 times, before she set aside childish things.)

My favorite was always Requiem for Methuselah.

Regardless of how spotty the original was, I happened to stumble on a new incarnation called simply "Enterprise".
Starring that time travelling do-gooder from "Quantum Leap"

I managed to force myself to watch about half of it.
When this captain berated and threatened to shoot the captain of a freighter who had the temerity to resist space pirates, I bailed.

The obvious parallel to trying to "understand" evil (911) instead of blindly lashing out (survival is "lashing out" in the 25th century), made me sick.

Good riddance to bad rubbish...

PC and multiculturalism and cultural relativism.
Bah. Humbug.

40 posted on 08/10/2002 8:42:48 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson