Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: oremus
Is this website critical of Mr. Westerfield for being a child rape porno collector?
584 posted on 08/09/2002 9:27:13 PM PDT by Greg Weston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies ]


To: Greg Weston
You prove your ignorance.

588 posted on 08/09/2002 9:34:27 PM PDT by oremus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]

To: Greg Weston
No, because he wasn't you a$$.
589 posted on 08/09/2002 9:37:25 PM PDT by kayti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]

To: Greg Weston
Read the transcripts. All of them. Watkins and Lawson both testified that they couldn't give a definitive answer whether the girls were underage or not. The rape was an anime. The supremes say it's legal. It was also downloaded by Neal.

So try actually reading the transcripts and not listening to Nancy Grace.
593 posted on 08/09/2002 9:40:27 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]

To: Greg Weston
Is this website critical of Mr. Westerfield for being a child rape porno collector?

I thought I read that the rape stuff was Japanese cartoons (anime), collectible more as a bizarre window into a dark corner of a foreign culture than as "wank material". Cartoons, by definition, cannot be kiddie porn. Didn't the Supremes so rule recently?

Wasn't the vast majority of his collection (99+%) normal adults with big tits?

The porn evidence comes across less as incriminating than as an unethical attempt to bolster a weak and incomplete murder case with irrelevant accusations.

597 posted on 08/09/2002 9:45:11 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson