Yes, it is. Add to that the fact that they decided (who decided? It was never said) not to fingerprint the offensive cd and zip disk cases. Why would that be? And what about the other fingerprints that were never id'ed? Never even tried. What about the fiber tests? Why not do the important ones that would have said "match" or "not match" instead of "similar"? Lots of questions about LE on this case, not limited to the actual evidence. The behavior of Otts and Keyser, the "leaks" of false information to the media--phewwwwww, something smells kinda rotten in SD.
Yep......the stench has only gotten worse with time.