Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
"I was certain it was a criticism of people with a different opinion and a declaration that anyone who didn't find DW guilty was unreasonable and irrational.

Hmmmmmm...... Maybe I need to read it again. I'll see if I can find where you talked about being interested in the truth."

Yes, I do think that anyone who doesn't think Westerfield did it is unreasonable and irrational. And I don't think being interested in the truth conflicts with that opinion.

399 posted on 08/09/2002 4:58:35 PM PDT by formerDem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]


To: formerDem
Yes, I do think that anyone who doesn't think Westerfield did it is unreasonable and irrational.

Lovely.

I'm so glad you popped in to explain how Dave Westerfield abducted the girl from her bedroom without leaving any physical evidence, waking the parents, alerting the dog, and the neighbors didn't see a thing (warning! ruby slippers, Klingon cloaking device, and Febreze is already taken).

Then please explain the testimony of the 4 entomologists' that say the body was exposed 4 to 18 days after DAW was under constant police watch ...

I'll be ever so grateful.

537 posted on 08/09/2002 7:16:06 PM PDT by dread78645
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies ]

To: formerDem
Yes, I do think that anyone who doesn't think Westerfield did it is unreasonable and irrational.

I guess it all depends on what the definition of 'is' is. LMAO

Only a Democrat could see that a different viewpoint must mean that a person is totally unreasonable.

638 posted on 08/09/2002 10:11:50 PM PDT by Dave_in_Upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson