I get accused of adultery. The proof she has is that a woman was in bed and so was I. We are both naked. There is semen on the sheets. The jury is give the evidence and begins deliberation.
Taking the evidence one by one.
We have three basic pieces of evidence
First, the woman was in my bed = My story is I must of left the door unlocked and she wondered in and went to sleep and she likes to sleep naked. Reasonable explanation. Favors my innocence. Using the interpretation the Westerfield's did it crew we must exclude the woman from the evidence.
Second, I am naked--I was changing my clothes but decided to take a nap. I thought the woman was my wife. Reasonable explanation. Favors my innocence. Must eliminate the evidence.
Third, semen on the sheets---I had a wet dream while sleeping. Reasonable explanation. Favors my innocence. Must eliminate evidence.
Remaining evidence ='s No woman in bed and no semen on sheets. Therefore, not guilty.
The result of believing that it is a one by one approach is absurd in practice. Therefore she I left the doorI can offer up as a defense that I was naked because i was going to change my clothes
I get accused of adultery. The proof she has is that a woman was in bed and so was I. We are both naked. There is semen on the sheets. The jury is give the evidence and begins deliberation.
Your analogy fails to apply for several reasons. The first is that no one would believe you so anything you say would not be considered as fact.
The second is that if MY wife walked in on me under those circumstances I would be dead. LOL