[is_is]

ALSO, IF THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE AS TO ANY PARTICULAR COUNT PERMITS TWO REASONABLE INTERPRETATIONS, ONE OF WHICH POINTS TO THE DEFENDANT'S GUILT AND THE OTHER TO HIS INNOCENCE, YOU MUST ADOPT THAT INTERPRETATION WHICH POINTS TO THE DEFENDANT'S INNOCENCE AND REJECT THAT INTERPRETATION WHICH POINTS TO HIS GUILT.

whether DW did it or not he walks because of that instruction.....i've said it before....the LE/DA messed this case up so bad we'll never know for sure who did it....regardless of the jury verdict!!!

[the Deejay]

"whether DW did it or not he walks because of that instruction."

Exactly correct! I don't know why that's so difficult
for some to comprehend.

[the Deejay]

I'll tell you something else, when that Not Guilty verdict comes in, watch the exploding heads of the van damnits! That'll be great to see.