[Greg Weston]

I've never seen so much nutbag BS speculation since the OJ trial. So Westerfield "didn't have enough" child rape porno to mean anything. Ridiculous. And 10 zillion other red herrings that don't amount to squat.

It's really a disgrace that some are willing let Westerfield off on child murder because they don't like the kids parents or whatever crazy thing. Absolutely disgraceful.

[L,TOWM]

No. I'll vote him not guilty because of the reasonable doubt. And for you, amen cornering some a$$hole that would lock up a jurror because their verdict in a court trial does'nt meet their approval? Or because some how having opinion that allows for the possibility of DW's being not guilty, some how aids and abets? Sorry, I can't sign on to your lynch mob. OTOH, give me one of his hairs in Danielle's room and a tire track at Dehesa, I'm tying the rope to a tree for you

The TIPS program obviously has some good candidates on this board to come up the names of undesirables for re education or "disappearence". I would even grant a fair hearing to some one as full of rage as you and fsticks if I was your jurror, but its OK to have Kangaroo Courts for some on that has little direct evidence against them and significant excupatory evidence for, just because of the charge and the efforts of our infallible LE. Welcome to Bulgaria, 1985 folks. Pathetic.