Deliberations Resume Friday, 8-9-02 In Trial Of David Westerfield (VERDICT WATCH CONTINUES!)

CNN.com ^ | August 9, 2002 | CNN

[mommya]

Dem - Here's a google link with a reference to the co........http://216.239.53.100/search?q=cache:l_KycXa2PzYC:www.quescom.com/press.asp%3FID%3D13+It%27s+Embedded+Inc.&hl=en&ie=UTF-8 ....about 1/3 down the list.

[SilentWitness]

Thank you for being easy on me, my first day here on FR.

I will try to drive by Bill Libby's place and report back over the weekend. Good night.

[the Deejay]

Can the webmaster get us one of those "IGNORE" buttons? It sure would be appreciated. Save us a lot of time.

[pinz-n-needlez]

watch it! Tee hee

[Jaded]

Just the immense spin.

[hoosiermama]

Then we'd have trouble telling the IGNORants from the IGNORees! :-)

[formerDem]

Well, I have to go to work for awhile.

I'll come back later with a martini and we can drink a toast to truth.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Search for the truth??????? Here you go dem.

Start with the transcripts from Day 1. Read every word and sprinkle common sense and logic all along the way. When you know it as well as most here do, come back and maybe you will get a little respect. Meanwhile............

[JudyB1938]

haaaaa haaaaa

I just KNEW somebody would think that.

(j/k Fres - you know we luv ya. ROFL)

I do admit I got mad at Fres one night for getting into a cat fight with people. But we made up, didn't we, Fres? :0)

[MizSterious]

FD, if you are indeed "just interested in the truth" may I suggest you surf yourself on over to the SD U-T site and read all the articles from the beginning of the case, then read the transcripts from the preliminary hearing and from the trial. All of them. I know it sounds daunting, but if you want to catch up with the rest of us, that's a good start.

Start, you say? Yes. After that, I suggest you do research on the relevant topics such as entomology, mummification, and (if you're not a computer wonk) the storage and access of files on a computer and the creation of animated graphics--just for starters.

Yup--that's what most of us have done. And it's led us to the conclusion that the case was not proven. If there is justice, Mr. Westerfield won't be convicted. That's a mighty big IF, and I fully expect a hung jury instead.

That will delight Brenda van Dam until she finds out what it means, but it will leave the rest of us still wishing for justice.

[FresnoDA]

LOL....

Ain't that the truth...

Definitely a Firecracker....

Or, the GOOD S.A.M.E. CLUB

Swingers

Against

Morals

Ethics

[mommya]

sorry Judy - I meant that last post of mine to go to Demsux.

[mommya]

see post 401

[Dave_in_Upland]

I get caught in bed with another woman and my wife walks in and catches us.

Your analogy fails to apply for several reasons. The first is that no one would believe you so anything you say would not be considered as fact.

The second is that if MY wife walked in on me under those circumstances I would be dead. LOL

[JudyB1938]

Wow. I don't think we realized this was your first day. At least I didn't. I knew I didn't recognize your name, but just thought I couldn't remember.

The reason people were nice to you is because you were nice to us. Welcome. Hope to see more of your posts!

[pinz-n-needlez]

Oops there goes another rubber tree plant!

I'm full of spit and vinegar tonight, as my grandmother would say.

I'm going to take my popcorn and wine and go watch LOTR. My daughter said TTT preview shows Galadriel giving out the gifts.

Anyone, feel free to make funny, insulting nonsequitors in my place. lol

[Yeti]

see what you are saying, but it seems to me, that Mudd did a pretty good job of endearing himself to the jury. While some of us see his actions as improper, my fear is, that the jury may think so highly of Mudd, that they will, subconsciously, be inclined to share some of this apparent bias toward the defense and DW.

If I were a juror, I wouldn't care much for Mudd. I would indeed spot the bias, and he was not that sincere or charismatic. Perfunctory and pseudomutual was how I saw him, although at first he seemed fair, or at least disinterested.

I think Mudd is hoping for semi-retirement as a Padres media personality. I think he will get a little work if he can take it soon.

[MizSterious]

No kidding. I'd reinstate my monthly payments if JohnRob would give us an "ignore" button. I'd even increase them.

[NatureGirl]

indulging in bizzare conspiracy theories

REALLY? Tsk tsk. That must be a first for FR.

direct evidence

Direct evidence? Such as? I'm sure that all I've heard in the closing arguments this week (from both sides) is that all the evidence is circumstantial .

Please explain your take on the bug testimony. And try to leave out anything that smacks of "bug theory doesn't work". The prosecution (and DUSEK) in particular have won cases using the bug boys.

[hoosiermama]

"I think Mudd is hoping for semi-retirement as a Padres media personality. I think he will get a little work if he can take it soon."

Ice tea spew! LOL