[Southflanknorthpawsis]

What did he say about this today?

I believe it was the very first thing he said to the jury today. He instructed them to not interpret comments, rulings, etc. by him to be favoring any one particular side of the case. Forgive my poor paraphrasing.

It appeared that he is concerned over acting as a confirmation for Dusek yesterday. Comments have been spoken in quite a few places that this was bad judgment on his part and could be appeal fodder. It seems he's trying to do some backpeddling now, but it doesn't erase it.

[small_l_libertarian]

Could you please tell me what he said yesterday - I watched for most of the day, but must have missed something fairly big. Didn't see anything about it in yesterday's threads either - can you point me to the right place?

[HoneyBoo]

Just heard on local SD tv station that jury has handed Mudd a note and will meet w. him at 1:30 pacific time. Could this mean they already have a verdict?

[MagnoliaMS]

Thanks for that explanation. What about Brenda furnishing a word that Dusek was searching for yesterday (I think I have that right)? Do you know what the word was? I have never heard of anything like that happening in court, either.