Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Hey South, I've been gone all morning and can't make heads or tails of what went on this AM with regard to the trial.

Any chance that you can give me the down and dirty?

80 posted on 08/08/2002 11:47:11 AM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: demsux
Dusek basically wanderered all over the place and didn't address the bug evidence other than to say all four experts were wrong. Is so, whay do they call it expert testimony. If it is allowed, the jury must accept all uncontroverted statements made by the expert. This is not a battle of experts since all the experts are on one side. That being the case, the jury needs toaccept that testimony as fact.
82 posted on 08/08/2002 11:50:54 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: demsux
Hi dems. For the most part it was just Dusek telling the jury that there were no other reasonable explanations for the blood, hair and fiber than what the prosecution claims.

As for Little River, she was expelled from the courtroom before the jury was ever brought in for being connected to a public report of things not meant to be public.

Dusek basically summarized yesterday's stuff.

Mudd tried to gracefuly wind himself out of siding with Dusek about the sweater yesterday by instructing the jury that his statements should not be considered an opinion, blah, blah, blah. I think he knows he may have given DW the golden key to appeal. It was a very dumb thing that he did.

88 posted on 08/08/2002 12:06:11 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson