Replies

I agree with you about the fiber evidence. However, the problem I have with it is that this "similar" fiber wasn't found in the VD home. At least I don't think there was any testimony to this being the case.

Yet, there was similar fiber found in DW home, DW MH, and on Danielle.

Perhaps the reason that a "similar" fiber wasn't found in the vD home is because they didn't look very hard for one. Either Jennifer Shen or Tanya DuLaney testified that the only fibers from the vD home they received for testing were carpet fibers from Danielle's room.

And all of us should keep in mind when considering any of this fiber evidence - Shen and DuLaney testified about several fibers that were similar in every way that they believed were a match - until they tested them with the microphotospectrometer (if I got that wrong - I know what I meant!). Only after that test were they determined to definitely NOT be a match.

These fibers all over the place that they are calling "similar" have not been tested with the microphotospectrometer. Why should we believe that all or even any of these fibers match anything?