[crystalk]

When DW took this jacket to the dry cleaner, the woman there says she saw no stains on it-- IT WAS HER JOB to look for any and note them down for special attention. Nor did DW note any to her, as customer usually does if he knows of any.

Yet, when police got the jacket, 3 stains of apparent blood and another stain of SOME kind, were readily apparent visually to the police evidence technician.

Isn't it obvious that these stains were put on the jacket well after the disappearance of Danielle, and in fact after the jacket was cleaned and returned to DW?

[Green]

I could be wrong here, but I thought the drycleaning was never picked up by DW, I though that LE picked up the cleaning. Anyone? What was the timeline here?

[crystalk]

Danielle's room was described as a virtual sump of DNA. There were (besides very much of her own) an incredible number of blood traces of dozens of people, not known, on her beanbag chair, others on the wall, in her bed, on the stair rail, it was more like what might be in a public toilet, than one little girl's suburban room!

And wasn't this AFTER it was cleaned?

[UCANSEE2]

Isn't it obvious that these stains were put on the jacket well after the disappearance of Danielle, and in fact after the jacket was cleaned and returned to DW?

That is what I have been saying.

BUT, another possibility is that the DRY CLEANING place is CRAPPY. That the clerk LIED, or DOESN'T Remember, or didn't want her boss to know she doesn't really check the garments.

Maybe she was STONED!

The reason I would BUY into the Stains having been there is that ONE was DW's Blood (at least they say so, we don't know for sure) and DW did have scrapes on his arms from trying to get the MH unstuck.

[BARLF]

I believe the LE picked the jacket up from cleaners. Dw never got it back. At least that was my understanding.....