Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2
The ACTUAL TEST that PROVES something IS BLOOD was not done.

Well that makes absolutely no sense at all unless there was some justifiable reason for this. Does the other test positively identifying blood require more of a sample than what was available. I can't think of any other reason for not doing that test.

503 posted on 08/08/2002 6:45:16 PM PDT by Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]


To: Green
The test on the jacket was phenolphthalein presumptive blood test. Reacts falsely to potatoes and horseradish & aged reagent.
519 posted on 08/08/2002 6:57:39 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: Green
They also did no blood spatter analysis which would have told them under what circumstances the blood came to rest on a particular surface.
528 posted on 08/08/2002 7:03:14 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson