Can anyone tell me - if he is acquitted, will anyone actually take a look at Damon, the BLUE DAM VAN, his strange instructions to the searchers, his visit to Dehesa @ 2/16, the friend, the talk of him having gone out to paintball that night??? Why haven't they already??? Too many things to wonder about. I am really on the fence - primarily concerned that the wrong guy could be convicted here. I don't give a rat's butt whether I'M right or wrong, I want the RIGHT GUY. And these VanDams WERE a little too concerned about THEMSELVES and acquiring new clothes and expensive cars and their image than their "missing" daughter, IMHO. Puhleeeeease!
2nd question: I thought the DNA on the jacket was found to not necessarily be blood - yet they kept calling it blood?
I thought the DNA on the jacket was found to not necessarily be blood - yet they kept calling it blood? the DNA on the carpet, on the jacket.
12 of 13 markers matched.
Now, what does that mean to you?
The 'expert' stated that a perfect match meant 1 out of a jillion people were who that DNA belonged. BUt THE EXPERT didn't say this was a perfect match. According to another poster it takes 25 markers matching to make an exclusionary match.
SO, the DNA evidence was a TOTAL SHAM !